"Only because you're talking about step C. I'm asking about step A."
You changed the subject from the topic of this thread. So you've conceded my original argument--that this guy hasn't supported the increased manpower his pet mission will require.
Baloney. The Congressman has called for steeper penalties for employers who hire illegals. It's in the first paragraph in the article.
So you've conceded my original argument--that this guy hasn't supported the increased manpower his pet mission will require.
Why would I concede anything when your assertion is silly?
I know Steve King, and he'll support whatever funding is needed to protect our national sovereignty.