Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: somerville
"I say he is convicted on the molestation charges. Not sure about conspiracy. They may shock everyone and convict him on that too."

If so, then the jury will have done a very bad job. The wackjob mother alone is reasonable doubt. I'm not saying Jacko isn't a molester, but this trial sure didn't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
54 posted on 06/08/2005 4:08:54 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (You're it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

So, basically, you are saying that anyone could molest those children and get away with it because of their mother?


62 posted on 06/08/2005 4:30:10 PM PDT by sharktrager (The masses will trade liberty for a more quiet life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Nobody understands "reasonable doubt" anymore....and the defense lawyers are taking that to the bank.

FWIW-

77 posted on 06/08/2005 4:47:51 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary Clinton is about as welcome as an egg-sucking dog...in my neck of the woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

I think they did prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Remember the strength of the testimony of prior victims.

Also, the mother isn't getting money from this trial. And it all comes down to her son's word, not hers. She is not on trial here.

The top notch defense lawyers I"ve seen on TV- Geoffrey Feiger, Robert Shapiro and others say that the prosecution proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt. "If this were anyone but Michael Jackson, the jury would have convicted him in a second," says Feiger.


90 posted on 06/09/2005 6:14:44 AM PDT by somerville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson