[robertpaulsen]

"We aren't at war with Cuba either. Yet we have an arguably legal embargo."

We have a legal embargo. We're not at war. You are in error to say that we must be at war in order to ban commerce with foreign nations.

[P_A_I]

We aren't at war with Cuba either. Yet we have an arguably legal embargo.

-- As usual, you want to nitpick over details while you ignore the Constitutional issues.

Why is it you want to believe a majority can issue prohibitions on objects using the guise of the commerce clause?

We have a(n) [arguably] legal embargo. We're not at war.

Exactly what I wrote just above.

You are in error to say that we must be at war in order to ban commerce with foreign nations.

You really are amusing paulsen, as you dance around nitpicking these issues. -- Admit it, you love all prohibitions. Even those on guns.