Posted on 06/13/2005 12:36:01 PM PDT by Dog
And a celebrated pedophile goes free.
What is Drudge's problem?
It's interesting that FReepers care so deeply about MJ.
But isn't that also the prosecution's fault for using them as witnesses? California prosecutors...
I cannot believe it!!! The first 3 counts regarding conspiracy, false imprisonment, and extortion weren't believable to me. The other 7 charges should have been a slam dunk.
The court system stinks, and every person who has been found guilty, or forced to plea bargain, should have their cases reviewed. MJ had child porn for chrissakes! He fed those boys "Jesus juice", aka alcohol, and got off. Look at the evidence posted on the Smoking Gun : ( This is BS!!!! I'd like to see a class action lawsuit happen for those who have been railroaded by disgruntled ex's.
Please let this be that last we ever have to hear about this disgusting child molesting freak!
Why are you persisting in trying the mother? The mother wasn't the one on trial here, MJ was.
I hope this is a lesson to prosecutor's everywhere. The second you have a witness who has perjured him/herself before, or made false statements to authorities, that's it! No more witness. We can't allow that crap to go on. Even if he is guilty, the state needs to put together an honest charge, not one made by con artists. A prosecutor who becomes emotionally involved, as this one clearly was, has lost his objectivity for establishing an honest charge.
Having said that, I hope this guy has seen the last of "sharing his bed in love". What a lunatic.
I honestly didn't follow this case that closely. I'm just posting out of disgust.
How did he get out of the administering booze to minors?
So what you're bascially saying is just what Jackson wants you to say/think; the family sucks so he can get away with it.
My guess is they return to shark attacks. That was the big news all summer 2001 even though the number of attacks was below average. This will hold the media over until somebody accidentally spills coffee on a Koran at Gitmo.
Amen to that!
Oh so true!!!!
Drudge is a HUGE Jackson fan.
It's like when a woman wasn't really raped because she was promiscuous in the past.
If Jackson picked the cast of characters (which I have no doubt about), how was the jury supposed to find him guilty without credible accusers?
I'm not sure the jurors could find him guilty..........even though he is..........without a better case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.