[DameAutour]

Good post, I agree. The man is weird, undeniably so. But I too am not sure if he's guilty. There was definitely reasonable doubt, and he had to be found not guilty and I'm glad that he was. If there's reasonable doubt, it MUST be not guilty. I've seen too many instances of people being found guilty based on reputation but without credible evidence, and they probably were guilty I guess, but it's always bothered me.

[TKDietz]

I agree with both of you. It was a weak case and the accusers were not credible. They were obviously out to make a buck and probably will still hit him up in a civil suit. He's a creepy guy, but that he did what he was accused of doing in this case was not proven to me and it obviously wasn't proven to the jury.