LOL. Probably very true. How can someone sleep w/a kid for 300+ days and the jury doesn't find him a perv? I had a problem w/the conspiracy charges, but thought at least they'd get him on the alcohol.
Here's my other question - the various staff who said they saw Jackson in a compromising position with a child - why didn't one of them try to stop Jackson or take the child away, if only momentarily? I never heard one word that a right thinking adult on his staff stepped in to protect a child. So, either he's surrounded by sniveling cowards, pervs, or maybe these things didn't happen? Who knows?
Over at DU, they think this is great....and the OJ verdict was right too.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3849560