Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PBS updates its set of editorial standards Moves follow threat to its federal funding
baltimoresun ^

Posted on 06/15/2005 1:23:24 PM PDT by phoenix_004

Facing charges of political bias and a threat to its funding from Congress, the Public Broadcasting Service yesterday adopted an updated set of editorial standards and announced that it would add an ombudsman who will report directly to PBS President Pat Mitchell.

The action comes in the wake of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting's hiring of two ombudsmen in April to give viewers a place to take their "complaints" about public broadcasting, according to CPB Chairman Kenneth Y. Tomlinson.

The panel includes Howard Finberg, director of interactive learning at the Poynter Institute of Media Studies; Marvin Kalb, senior fellow at the Shorenstein Center at Harvard University; Geneva Overholser of the University of Missouri School of Journalism; John Seigenthaler, founder of the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University; and former CNN anchorman Bernard Shaw. Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, served as professional adviser to the committee.

The standards announced yesterday update PBS program policies adopted in 1971 and revised in 1987. The changes were minimal, and the alterations that were made were done mainly with an eye toward PBS material that would appear on the Internet.

In an introduction to the new standards, posted yesterday on the pbs.org Web site, the committee called the 1987 document "well conceived and remarkably contemporary." Overall, it urged PBS to "continue to operate according to the overall principles" articulated in 1987. But it also saw a need for "policies less exclusively concerned with television" and more in touch with such new realities as Web sites, online journals and blogs that might involve PBS material. Whether the material is on-air or online, the new standards urge "that a hallmark for PBS ... should be transparency."

(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: liberal; pbs; theleasttheycoulddo

1 posted on 06/15/2005 1:23:25 PM PDT by phoenix_004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

End the tax payer rip off of PBS leeches NOW


2 posted on 06/15/2005 1:26:15 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Taglines often reveal a lot about the inner person...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

You just can't change the spots on a leopard. Shut them down and be done with it.

Sure, they will change their operation until the liberals get back into power.


3 posted on 06/15/2005 1:27:09 PM PDT by DH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004
The panel includes Howard Finberg, director of interactive learning at the Poynter Institute of Media Studies; Marvin Kalb, senior fellow at the Shorenstein Center at Harvard University; Geneva Overholser of the University of Missouri School of Journalism; John Seigenthaler, founder of the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University; and former CNN anchorman Bernard Shaw. Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, served as professional adviser to the committee

They add a panel of liberals and hope to balance out programming? For a "educational" network, PBS is comprised of incredible morons! Only ones missing are Dan Rather, Micheal Moore and Bill Moyer!

4 posted on 06/15/2005 1:27:09 PM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004
The panel includes Howard Finberg, director of interactive learning at the Poynter Institute of Media Studies; Marvin Kalb, senior fellow at the Shorenstein Center at Harvard University; Geneva Overholser of the University of Missouri School of Journalism; John Seigenthaler, founder of the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University; and former CNN anchorman Bernard Shaw. Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, served as professional adviser to the committee.

I believe the whole lot are on record as being in favor of banning private ownership of firearms.

5 posted on 06/15/2005 1:27:39 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

Marvin Kalb? Bernie Shaw? And the other liberals?

Well conceived?

My goodness gracious sakes alive! Bias is running rampant, and they think their standards are "well conceived".

Inmates running asylum.


6 posted on 06/15/2005 1:29:10 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004
This proposal sounds like the fox watching the henhouse.
Didn't all these academic names produce the current crop of intellectually inert propagandists and indoctrination types?
7 posted on 06/15/2005 1:34:53 PM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

I think Moveon.org has a petition going to prevent any changes.

That ought to tell us something.


8 posted on 06/15/2005 1:37:00 PM PDT by Mears (Keep the government out of my face!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

Let's get Osama and Sadam to review our foreign policy...


9 posted on 06/15/2005 1:38:47 PM PDT by marktuoni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktuoni

It's all smokin' mirrors.

Tax payers shouldn't have to pay for a side show they're not interested in.


10 posted on 06/15/2005 1:44:35 PM PDT by This Just In ("Those are my principles, if you don't like them, I've got others" - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004
I hope the Republicans follow principle and aren't swayed by this ideological bribery.
11 posted on 06/15/2005 1:55:09 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

Geneva Overholser? Not only a practitioner of leftist advocacy journalism, but one who has something of a reverse Midas' touch. She was instrumental in changing the Des Moines Register from a paper of declining standards to one with hardly any standards at all.


12 posted on 06/15/2005 2:07:37 PM PDT by niteowl77 (I see seven senators badly in need of emergency RINOplasty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

If they didn't have an liberal editorial bias there would be no need to update their editorial standards. The fact that they did this is an admission of their leftist views.


13 posted on 06/15/2005 2:08:24 PM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004
that a hallmark for PBS ... should be transparency.

I concur. It should be impossible for me to see.
14 posted on 06/15/2005 2:12:15 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH

Yeah, did you see their board members? Bernard Shaw, a Harvard guy, John Siegenthaler, a professor of journalism, etc.

Liberals all.

That should restore some balance to things over there.


15 posted on 06/15/2005 2:14:37 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

Too little too late.


16 posted on 06/15/2005 2:14:39 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edskid

Too, too true! Recall, please, that former RINO congressman and Des Moines Register sockpuppet Doug Bereuter hurried the process along.


17 posted on 06/15/2005 2:47:26 PM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

Geneva Overholser ?


18 posted on 06/15/2005 2:57:20 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ops33

"The fact that they did this is an admission of their leftist views."

Good point. And the people they tapped to be on their panel shows you how leftist they really are.


19 posted on 06/15/2005 3:16:37 PM PDT by Owl558 (Please excuse my spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Heh, heh... you said "sockpuppet." And I agree.

My folks had gotten the Register ever since I could remember (that's back to when Dwight Eisenhower was in the White House), but dumped it a while back when the number of homosexual advocacy articles/editorials in each issue exceeded the number of sections. I suspect that they might have initially missed making fun of Rekha Basu's ignorance of reality, but when you have a cat and a large paper bag, you pretty much have equivalent amusement right there.

20 posted on 06/15/2005 3:39:16 PM PDT by niteowl77 (I see seven senators badly in need of emergency RINOplasty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson