Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dervish
"In fact I questioned the reasons the US went in to protect SA in Gulf 1."

So Saddam should have been allowed to overtake both Kuwait and SA ?

"Are your views of Muslims uniform or do you single out those in SA as singularly robotic?"

What ?

"In other threads you condemned Russian treatment of Chechen Muslims. Why?"

Why ? Hmmm because in last 10 years they killed one third of people in Chechnya ?
79 posted on 06/27/2005 8:10:13 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Grzegorz 246

You: "Tell the Saudis that Allah want them to be poor, they would reply: Great ! So I want to be even poorer !"

That is Robotic.

So I asked:

"Are your views of Muslims uniform or do you single out those in SA as singularly robotic?"

You: "Saudi fanatics would attack in human waves smiling that soon they will see Allah."

So basing my question on your view of Muslims as robotic and Jihadist I asked:

"In other threads you condemned Russian treatment of Chechen Muslims. Why?"

So if Muslims attack in "human waves" as described by you what choice do the Russians have in fighting the Chechens? Or are Saudis different than Chechens? And if so how and why.

You can't have it all ways. You say the US would not be able to fight the Saudis because of the ferocity of Saudi response and their willingness to die, yet you condemn the Russians for their approach.


80 posted on 06/27/2005 8:52:20 AM PDT by dervish (multilateralism is the lowest common denominator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson