Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bourbon; WKB; wardaddy

Mississippy (and South) bashing is getting old. The facts speak for themselves, Chicago.


14 posted on 07/02/2005 10:17:50 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stainlessbanner
"It was one thing, King argued, to defeat the overt racism of snarling southerners like Bull Connor; it was another thing to confront the deeper, more covert institutional racism that lived beneath the less openly bigoted, smiling face of northern and urban liberalism."

MLK said that?
"bigoted, smiling face of northern and urban liberalism." Reminds me of Hillary. Is she from Chicago?

15 posted on 07/02/2005 10:19:34 AM PDT by bayourod (Unless we get 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner; wardaddy; WKB
I've lived in Chicago and MS. There is racism in both places, no doubt. And, it is hard to say which locale is more or less "racist."

The main difference between Chicago and MS that I saw was that there was less black militancy and white fear in MS, despite MS's proportionally larger black population and its tarnished past. Blacks and whites seemed to get along better in MS because they were more comfortable living together.

I like to think that Southern manners and an aversion to extreme liberal poltics among (black and white) Southerners probably also has something to do with this.

18 posted on 07/02/2005 10:47:09 AM PDT by bourbon (Hal Needham is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson