Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake
My stance on this was that if, as we've been hearing, this was designed to coincide with the G8 summit, why didn't they bomb in Scotland instead of London? Someone on here said that London had a larger population and therefore would produce more casualties. Perhaps that is so, but it still doesn't make sense to me.

OTOH, if they just want to scare the British, as you say, bombing London makes sense.

Carolyn

115 posted on 07/07/2005 9:57:59 AM PDT by CDHart (The world has become a lunatic asylum and the lunatics are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: CDHart

They attacked London BECAUSE: 30% of the METROPOLITAN POLICE (trained to confront terrorist attacks since the IRA bombings) was transfered to Scotland to protect the G8. Hence London was left with LESS security.


122 posted on 07/07/2005 2:06:34 PM PDT by Ippolita (Si vis pacem para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson