Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
"I would be perfectly satisfied with a compromise solution where a pet owner is responsible for the behavior of the pet as if the owner himself had committed the act of the pet. Anything less is a betrayal of the principle of responsibility that underpins our liberty."

With the exception of mitigating factors (the gun was stolen, the dog was tormented, the battery was in self defense....)
I don't disagree.

What I do not like, or tolerate, is the inflamed discourse that goes (went) before.

That, and the hollow victory (?) of destroying something that simply was in order to punish something that we are unable to even define.

PS: What IS your position of the offspring of crack heads, murderers, or rapists?? [Sorry, had to do it.]

171 posted on 07/20/2005 6:17:48 PM PDT by STILL NORTON (don't ask, computer went down, name went away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: STILL NORTON; Squantos
[Sorry, had to do it.]

No kidding...lol....blacks and hispanics commit disproportionate crime in comparison to non-hispanic whites and most asians.....can we ban blacks and hispanics too?

ludacris of course

this reminds me of what is an assault weapon..lol

176 posted on 07/20/2005 6:22:05 PM PDT by wardaddy (i love my new discounted GMC dually......proud flyoverlander.....bonnie blue out front!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson