Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Openly Supports Iranian Terrorists MEK
Electronic Iraq ^ | 27/7/05 | William Van Wagenen

Posted on 07/27/2005 1:40:09 PM PDT by F14 Pilot

The U.S. Government is now openly supporting the Mujahideen-e-Khalq, an Iranian resistance movement designated as terrorist organization by the US State Department. On June 20th of this year, the Mujahideen-e-Khalq held a conference at the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad, which is where many foreign journalists stay and is under the full protection of the U.S. Army. I was in the area of the hotel that day, and saw at least 10 U.S. tanks heading in the direction of the hotel to provide additional security. I knew of the conference in advance, because of a report issued to all NGO's working in Iraq, which mentioned that the conference would take place. The report warned of an increased danger of attacks against the hotel, as anti- U.S. insurgents were likely to attempt to disrupt the conference [1].

The Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK) is a Marxist oriented Iranian resistance organization founded in the 1960's to topple the pro- western regime of Reza Shah. Since that time, MEK has carried out scores of attacks and assassinated a number of Iranian government officials. MEK killed several American military and civilian personnel in Iran during the 1970's, and assisted in the occupation of the US embassy in Tehran in 1979 where American civilians were held hostage. Though MEK participated in the 1979 revolution, which toppled the Shah, once the Ayatollah Khomeini consolidated power in Iran, MEK moved their headquarters to Paris and continued resistance activities against the Islamic Republic. In 1981, MEK bombed the offices of the Islamic Republic Party, killing 70 high-ranking Iranian officials. MEK established its military headquarters in Iraq in 1986, where Saddam Hussein became their main source of funding and protection. In return, the MEK fought alongside Iraqi forces during the war against Iran in the 1980's, and assisted Saddam's security forces in putting down the Kurdish and Shiite revolts after the first Gulf War in 1991. The majority of Saddam's recently discovered mass graves are filled with the Shiite and Kurdish dead from this uprising. MEK military operations against Iranian targets continued through the 1990's. The U.S. Department of State added the MEK to its official list of terrorist organizations in 1997, and shut down the organization's Washington, DC office in 2003 [2].

During the U.S. invasion of Iraq, MEK forces in Iraq surrendered to U.S. forces and turned over their military hard wear, including several thousand tanks, armored personnel carriers, anti-aircraft guns, and other vehicles. Despite denying suspected terrorists from Afghanistan and elsewhere prisoner of war status under the Geneva conventions, the US granted this status to detained members of MEK in Iraq [3].

Support for the MEK reveals one of the advantages the U.S. has acquired by occupying Iraq. The country can now be used as a staging post for carrying out attacks against regimes hostile to U.S. interests in the region, whether through proxy organizations such as MEK, or by attacking such countries directly by dispatching U.S. forces based on Iraqi soil. U.S. planners are currently somewhat constrained from using the latter option due to the difficulty they face in pacifying Iraq, so the first option, namely supporting terrorist organizations that are trying to destabilize the Iranian regime, will likely be their preferred course of action until U.S. control of Iraq is fully consolidated.

So when Paul Wolfowitz promised Iraqis in 2003 that the US would hunt down the "monsters" that assisted Saddam in digging the mass graves in 1991 [4], the Bush administration was in fact just beginning its support for some of the direct perpetrators of these crimes. Also revealing is U.S. criticism of the new Iranian president elect, due to his alleged involvement in holding U.S. embassy personnel hostage in 1979. Though the U.S. admits the MEK was involved in the same incident, White House support for this terrorist organization continues. This kind of hypocrisy reveals much about what the global "war on terror" is really about. It's not a war against terror as such, but rather a war of terror to subdue resistance to the US designs in the region.

Sources:

[1] The organization which provides these security reports does not allow them to be cited publicly, and thus I cannot indicate the name of the source. The report for June 19th, 2005 stated the following: "A large conference involving the mujahadeen kalk and sponsored by the Iraqi Government is scheduled to take place in the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad 20th June, this may lead to insurgent attempts to disrupt the conference, HOM are advised to advise their staff to avoid this area."

[2] US State Department, Patterns of Global Terrorism 2002 (pdf). See specifically Appendix B: Background Information on designated foreign terrorist organizations, pg. 115 for information on the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq

See also this description of the group from Globalsecurity.org.

[3] Why the US granted 'protected' status to Iranian terrorists, The Christian Science Monitor, 07/29/2004.

[4] New York Times, July 20th, 2003.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: biasedreporting; bush; eu; fundamentalism; grabage; hated; iran; iraq; islam; marxist; mek; mko; ncri; paris; people; pmoi; rajavi; terrorism; tinfoil; us; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-176 next last
To: Khashayar

How? They can't leave Iraq.


81 posted on 07/27/2005 2:50:00 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Khashayar
"I guess you would like to support MEK."

That makes you wrong yet again.

82 posted on 07/27/2005 2:50:20 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Well, I see you as a person who thinks whatever Right does is sacred, absolutely right and ...


83 posted on 07/27/2005 2:50:27 PM PDT by Khashayar (Oh You Little...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Well, if wondering about the facts in an article constitutes defending an entire website, then I'd say that's the type of rationale that closed-minded DU'ers use all the time.

Have a nice evening.


84 posted on 07/27/2005 2:50:34 PM PDT by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

So tell me what difference it makes if the source of the article was Washington Times?


85 posted on 07/27/2005 2:50:54 PM PDT by Khashayar (Oh You Little...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

But they are active in DC, Denver, LA, Paris, London, Berlin

This aint war on terror!


86 posted on 07/27/2005 2:51:47 PM PDT by Khashayar (Oh You Little...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

War On Terror?

it's called a "struggle" now


87 posted on 07/27/2005 2:51:58 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock - Make the elected personally liable for their wasteful spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

Yeah!

I heard that!


88 posted on 07/27/2005 2:52:33 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Look. When I first heard that we had come to an agreement with the MEK I was upset.

When I looked into it further, I realized that we had not really come to an agreement with them. We gave them an ultimatum. They are not allowed to attack anyone. Iran, inside Iraq. Nowhere.

If they do. All bets are off.


89 posted on 07/27/2005 2:52:51 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Khashayar

Define "active".


90 posted on 07/27/2005 2:53:19 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

USA, France and China don't want to see a democratic Iran.
Both USA and France will always do anything they can to stop Iran becoming a great democratic country.
They did it before (1979), they'll do it again.
Now China has joined the bandwagon.

France supports the Mujahideen-e-Khalq.
The MEK is based in France and is nearly openly supported by the French government.

My thoughts go to the young Iranians.
Nobody cares about them.I do.


91 posted on 07/27/2005 2:53:24 PM PDT by thierrya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khashayar
"So tell me what difference it makes if the source of the article was Washington Times?"

So tell me what difference it makes if the source of the article was Michael Moore?

92 posted on 07/27/2005 2:53:42 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

If they do. All bets are off.

I'll bet they got a check too.............


93 posted on 07/27/2005 2:53:57 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock - Make the elected personally liable for their wasteful spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
"Well, if wondering about the facts in an article constitutes defending an entire website..."

LOL! Hardly, ignoring the truth about a website to pursue an agenda is directly out of the DU playbook. You are good at it...a shame that anyone can actually go to the site and see the truth.

94 posted on 07/27/2005 2:54:29 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: thierrya

Good to hear from you!


95 posted on 07/27/2005 2:54:30 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

More like a JDAM.


96 posted on 07/27/2005 2:54:38 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

I asked you the question first!


97 posted on 07/27/2005 2:55:10 PM PDT by Khashayar (Oh You Little...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Fact is still unchanged...

US is cooperating with the enemies of Iranian people!

It doesn't matter who talks about the issue.

The ISSUE is "cooperation between US and bunch of world wide known terrorists".

Is that legitimate?


98 posted on 07/27/2005 2:56:55 PM PDT by Khashayar (Oh You Little...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

I know that.
But if they're taken off the the FTO list, all bets may be on. And that's what upsets Iranians and those of us supporting their desire for a democratic gov't.


99 posted on 07/27/2005 2:57:15 PM PDT by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Khashayar
"I asked you the question first!"

So you do think Michael Moore is a creditable source. Thanks.

100 posted on 07/27/2005 2:57:38 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson