Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve_Seattle
Oh, it was snide. But it would only be a 'slam' to those who don't agree with those views. Me - I would think that even those whose views are 100% in alignment with his would have a hard time not letting a grin slip out when the phrase 'man on dog' crossed their mind. Which, when I was thinking of actually being two men and a woman simultaneously - much less being with - couldn't help but think about his parade of horribles.

In response to your other comments about Fitz, I have a hard time understanding how people could crow to high heaven that 'she wasn't covert' or 'she outed herself' without at least implying that he is an putz. Because, if there is a grain of truth to what they are saying, then he has spent time and resources on a two-year investigation of absolutely nothing.

160 posted on 08/03/2005 1:40:31 PM PDT by lugsoul ("She talks and she laughs." - Tom DeLay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
"In response to your other comments about Fitz, I have a hard time understanding how people could crow to high heaven that 'she wasn't covert' or 'she outed herself' without at least implying that he is an putz. Because, if there is a grain of truth to what they are saying, then he has spent time and resources on a two-year investigation of absolutely nothing."

This wouldn't be the first time that an investigation led to nothing that would support a criminal indictment or a successful prosecution, even if there remained unanswered questions. (For example, the special prosecutor who followed Kenneth Starr - I forget his name - thought he had a pretty good perjury case against Hillary Clinton, but declined to prosecute because he thought the public wanted to move on and he'd have trouble getting an unbiased jury because of the vicious and highly effective public campaign mounted against the prosecutor's office by the Clinton people.)

Fitzgerald was just accepting an assignment without prejudging the results; if he can't find convincing evidence of criminal conduct, that doesn't make him a putz. One reason that so many people here are getting on your case is that you seem absolutely convinced that a crime was committed, which in my opinion goes as much beyond the known evidence as a lot of the things you've criticized coming from others.
164 posted on 08/03/2005 1:54:36 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson