Skip to comments.
NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN
Drudge Report ^
| August 3, 2005
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 08/04/2005 8:48:41 AM PDT by kennedy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 781-789 next last
To: HonestConservative
I just hope the GOP records every stupid word recorded by the Democrats on this for future use! Newt is great, we need him out there teaching, especially the kids!
541
posted on
08/04/2005 12:38:35 PM PDT
by
defconw
(ALLEN IN 08)
To: KC_Conspirator
The way to fight this and really, REALLY shame the NYT is to prove that the children did not know they were adopted, to learn what the Roberts' plan was to eventually tell them when they were old enough to understand, and explain how the Left's partisan politics robbed these children of their childhood and has now thrown their entire concept of their family into chaos for partisan political gain.
This is something that the American people can internalize very quickly.
-PJ
To: Grenada
I had two very close male friends in college that were born and raised in Argentina. They were both as white as my lily-white Irish a$$. I asked them about their coloring once. They explained to me that most of the upper class in South America decended from European conquerors. It is not THAT unusual to see WHITE Latin Americans. Just think of t he history of the areas. The key word is "upperclass". Whites in Latin America tend to be in the upperclass, so how many white Latin American babies end up in an orphanages unwanted by their fellow countrymen? Healthy white infants are in high demand in the U.S.- if there was a surplus of adoptable white Latin American children, you would hear about couples adopting from Argentina, Chile, southern Brazil, etc. a lot more often. I know that there are quite a few Europeans in South America, but the majority of people are still mestizo.
Of course, as many have stated above, we are speculating based on the hair color of children, which could very well change over time.
543
posted on
08/04/2005 12:45:53 PM PDT
by
LWalk18
To: kennedy
544
posted on
08/04/2005 12:47:13 PM PDT
by
Dave S
To: freedrudge
The clothes probably arent "hip hop" enough for the NYT. Culturally insensitive kids you know.
545
posted on
08/04/2005 12:47:43 PM PDT
by
LongsforReagan
(Bush is more of a big spender than Clinton, even if you dont include defense. FACT.)
To: kennedy
Sounds like the loony left is at it once again. Yet once again I continued to be completely and utterly amazed at the level these pigs will drop to so they can accomplish their goals, and yet stupid Americans continue to believe and follow these pigs. Words fail me. Can't get the man, so just slime his adoptive children. Wonderful. Total pigs. They should be strung up by the heels and gutted.
546
posted on
08/04/2005 12:50:25 PM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(The government and courts are stealing your freedom & liberty!)
To: LWalk18
This not pretty ,but upper class men in south America have relations with lower class women.Mexican border towns have many tow headed street children.
To: Political Junkie Too
The way to fight this and really, REALLY shame the NYT is to prove that the children did not know they were adopted, to learn what the Roberts' plan was to eventually tell them when they were old enough to understand, and explain how the Left's partisan politics robbed these children of their childhood and has now thrown their entire concept of their family into chaos for partisan political gain. This is something that the American people can internalize very quickly. I don't think that the Roberts were trying to hide the fact that the children are adopted, given that it has been talked out since day one by both his supporters and detractors.
Being adopted is nothing to be ashamed of, or some dirty secret- those kids and the Roberts are very blessed to have one another. Many couples adopt children who are not the same race as themselves or who clearly look different from them, and no one talks about how they were "robbed of their childhood" because everyone can tell instantly that they were adopted.
548
posted on
08/04/2005 12:51:34 PM PDT
by
LWalk18
To: hobbes1
"seems that the Chelsea Clinton standard no longer applies"
True. Mrs. Roberts definitely didn't have sex with Web Hubble.
549
posted on
08/04/2005 12:59:49 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(Mexico, the 51st state.)
To: hobbes1
To: Primetimedonna
"Guess the difference is that their Dad (John Edwards) is a Democrat!!"
And a jackass and an idiot to boot, but I guess thats already a given.
551
posted on
08/04/2005 1:01:24 PM PDT
by
LongsforReagan
(Bush is more of a big spender than Clinton, even if you dont include defense. FACT.)
To: kennedy
The NY Slimes has finally sunk to the bottom of the cess pool. Next to them, the National Enquirer looks credible.
To: kennedy
Remind me again why nobody was allowed to examine alGore's kid's record during the 2000 election?
553
posted on
08/04/2005 1:04:37 PM PDT
by
solitas
(So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
To: texianyankee
south americans as do some of Mexico has many fair skinned,Blond haired, blue/green eyed people. European tranplants.
To: LongsforReagan
And a jackass and an idiot to boot, but I guess thats already a given.
This really made me laugh! Thanks!
555
posted on
08/04/2005 1:07:24 PM PDT
by
defconw
(ALLEN IN 08)
To: LWalk18
A few years ago ,the hot place to adopt children was Ecuador.Like all of South America, Ecuador has children of all skin tones and races.The leftist rag in the area did a hit piece in which gringos were accused of adopting the children so they could steal the kidneys.After this , an American women who trying to adopt a child was nearly beaten to death.
It's just easier to adopt children from the Chinese.
To: kennedy
These a--holes are f--king disgusting. Going after little kids now? Little kids, or as liberals call them "the abortions that got away".
557
posted on
08/04/2005 1:08:43 PM PDT
by
trubluolyguy
(I'm making faces at sick people)
To: newfrpr04
"south americans as do some of Mexico has many fair skinned,Blond haired, blue/green eyed people. European tranplants."
As do northern Italians.
558
posted on
08/04/2005 1:10:45 PM PDT
by
hophead
(" Shi'ite happens..")
To: Fudd Fan
Well I think the major [and disgusting] story here is that the NYSlimes has stooped too low, not that there will be anything damning in the "investigation."
I agree in that I don't think they'll find or did find anything... But with nothing to actually report they tickle Drudge with a scoop thing and he runs with it so it gets media play but not from them. jmo.
559
posted on
08/04/2005 1:14:12 PM PDT
by
deport
(If you want something bad enough, there's someone who will sell it to you. Even the truth your way.)
To: texianyankee
"and exactly what is the nytimes trying to find? this is total crap."
They are trying to find things like "nannygate" where the candidate employed illegals. The Slimes is going to attempt to place the Roberts' with illegals when they adopted their children.
560
posted on
08/04/2005 1:14:18 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 781-789 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson