To: Brytani
The way I read the letter was that they investigated the adoptions and could uncover nothing out of the order.
Had they uncovered something like going around a certain agency or not filling in all the spaces, I assume they would have gone after Roberts children with all hands armed to the hilt on deck and be damned to the feelings of Roberts, his wife or the mental stability of the children for years to come.
I hate to think that we have such a bunch of scumbags led by a purported homosexual with an apparent anti-Christian, anti-Bush, anti-American agenda.
646 posted on
08/04/2005 4:00:30 PM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
To: OKIEDOC
You didn't hear Brit Hume on FoxNews' panel - catch the replay. The Slimes was fishing. Brit reported that people he talked to said that they (the Slimes) was inquiring of lawyers how to get the adoption records unsealed.
649 posted on
08/04/2005 4:03:13 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(Liberals...they're so quixotic.)
To: OKIEDOC
Exactly, they looked into the adoption records in hopes of finding something on Roberts - a fishing expedition.
According to Britt Hume tonight on Fox, he spoke personally to an attorney the Times tried to hire to have the records unsealed. That's a bit more than looking into them, IMO.
686 posted on
08/04/2005 7:06:42 PM PDT by
Brytani
("Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work - Edison)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson