NCAA Bans Indian Mascots During Postseason

AP ^ | Aug 5, 2005

[Mark was here]

Hey lady, your ancestor set up these rules and regulations, so why in the hell shouldn't we benefit from them. That's what they were meant to do in the first place, a benefit to the Indians.

How about TWO WRONGS don't make a RIGHT?

EVER THINK OF THAT?

IF YOU WANT TO PLAY THE GROUP RIGHTS THING - FINE WITH ME - TWO CAN PLAY THAT GAME!

All I was saying and you can not grasp or are unwilling to grasp is that things will work out better when we all are just AMERICANS with the same RESPONSIBILITIES under the Law.

If talking about group rights verses individual rights makes me nasty, I could care less. My family is not welfare dependent. My family does not line up to go into protective custody every night in Gallop, New Mexico after having too much to drink. If you find this talk unpleasant look at your last post with your Hey lady, your ancestor set up these rules and regulations, so why in the hell shouldn't we benefit from them. That says to me loud and clear, you clearly live in a WE vs.THEM world. This world is bitter and divisive and leads to bad things. This is your desire of GROUP RIGHTS, coming to fruition.

But I'm the evil one who is willing to be unpopular and stand up and say group rights are wrong.

Put it this way:

Your race may be a good reason to have a party, but it is the worst reason in the world to form a party.

[dznutz]

that view will change this fall

[duffthor]

Actually the guy initially came in saying that he was going to bring back the full "Cornhuskers" name. So far he has fired a pretty killer coach after a 10-2 season, brought in a new who immediately commenced with the sucking. It's gotten harder for regular guys to get to a game, and now we're known here for having a completely queer looking inflatable mascot.