Posted on 08/11/2005 9:17:22 PM PDT by nycfree
But as for the hubby felony factor, the lefties have it right.
Al is no bill.
Two summers ago, Hill took speech lessons and thus no longer says 'uh' and 'ya know' every six seconds. That aside, she'll definitely be in trouble during the primaries since she can't take the heat or serious debate. Never fear, though, Hillary fans, she can do the 'don't answer direct questions' ploy, otherwise known as fogging, in her sleep. Fasten seat belts. Bette Davis was right about bumpy nights.
I saw Chris Wallace last night and was appalled at the way he reported Pirro's entry into the race. He acted like Hill's lapdog. Slobber, slobber.
Bill and the missus (the Power Couple), will be on Nantucket this weekend, or maybe today, for a fundraiser! Probably the Heinz-Kerry's are vacationing elsewhere and won't be able to attend, but I bet they got an engraved invitation.
An apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
I am in no way supporting Hillary. If Pirro is on the ballot in November 06 I will hold my nose and support her. But my question is, why are you all so quick to write off John Spencer and Ed Cox?
The clintonoids doth protest too much, methinks. Or, in this case, is it 'too little'???
Face it... we're stuck in a blue state. A very blue state. There is NO WAY IN H*LL that either of these two men, no matter how well intentioned, can carry more than 30% of the vote. The way I see it, if it's a 2- way race between Hitlery and Pirro, it will be devastating to the former. If we throw in a truly conservative candidate, Pirro loses her steam. I'd rather see Hitlery go down in flames than see a Repub runner just crash and burn. Much more entertaining... much more meaningful. Both of these guys need to realize this, and let things be.
Thanks for the bump!
It's 'complicated,' as John Kerry is wont to say. She's committed to running for the Presidency, no question -- it's her last chance. The senate seat, though, is something else. She appears powerful and useful, gets on tv any time, night or day to remind us how awful she is. But what would happen if Bill fell really ill again? If he died, God forbid, she'd be the brave widow Clinton, carrying on the Clinton legacy. If he was merely sick, it might be hard to run around making stump speeches, but she'd do it anyway. And it would be difficult for her opponents to appear critical about anything she said or did.
She doesn't really need the senate seat anymore. In the MSM's eyes, she's already Empress of the World. John Edwards and Howard Dean were both in New Hampshire a few days ago, trolling for voters, and the lack of public office doesn't seem to hurt them. I wonder if they're trying for the VP slot on her ticket? The thought of her winning like some dreadful curse (think Salem's Lot), which is what she'd be for this country. We do live in interesting times! Perilous, but interesting.
Alll Pirro has to do is shrink Hillary's margin of victory to 5% and she "wins." Hillary's credibility as a Presidential vote getter will be severely damaged...and that's the "victory" that Pirro can win...if she does that, she can write her own ticket politically with the GOP.
Pirro is more telegenic, just as smart, and has a no-bull attitude...I look forward to their debates.
"Alll Pirro has to do is shrink Hillary's margin of victory to 5% and she "wins." Hillary's credibility as a Presidential vote getter will be severely damaged...and that's the "victory" that Pirro can win...if she does that, she can write her own ticket politically with the GOP.
Pirro is more telegenic, just as smart, and has a no-bull attitude...I look forward to their debates."
DEBATES!?!?!? A PHONY frikkin Q&A format controlled by the the stale same old leftover Media punditautocracy is NOT A VALID DEBATE!!! (I get angry at the thought of it.) The leftover biased TV Media has controlled campaign "debates" for decades - force-feeding us with their frikkin phony debate format and their frikkin instant-pundit analysis interruptus. GAD! Why in Hell do we put with it?
Pirro is FAR smarter and sharper on her feet than Hillary. Hillary will wilt and shrink - she cannot stand up to Pirro. Hillary Clinton will implode. I look forward to it.
"Two summers ago, Hill took speech lessons and thus no longer says 'uh' and 'ya know' every six seconds. That aside, she'll definitely be in trouble during the primaries since she can't take the heat or serious debate. Never fear, though, Hillary fans, she can do the 'don't answer direct questions' ploy, otherwise known as fogging, in her sleep. Fasten seat belts. Bette Davis was right about bumpy nights."
Corrective speech lessons cannot disguise Hillary's palpable megalomania. Hillary will implode in debate and in ad lib. The MSM no longer has credibility and exclusivity in "reporting" political news. The MEDIA can no longer deceive us by dissembling and misrepresenting Hillary's ideological burps and blunders which seep through her pander and demagoguery. The MSM hoists Hillary on THEIR petard and you know what results: hot air flatulance. Hillary will implode. Hopefully, George Soros goes bankrupt funding Hillary's campaigns. No matter what the devious Spin is, it will be rebutted to prove Hillary Clinton is a prime loser.
The radical right needs to realize that there are all types of Republicans. People who vote Republican don't necessarily believe exactly as you do, no matter how much you want it to be so.
I vote Republican because I'm financially conservative, somewhat hawkish, and very pro-military. I'm socially libertarian, and there are a lot of Republicans like me.
If you confine the party to ONLY what you believe - small government in your pockets, big government in your bedroom, big government protectionism, you're going to have a typical third party - enough to spoil an election but not nearly enough to begin to start swinging the pendulum back in toward smaller government.
Consider all the issues, consider the alternative candidate and how the country would be if that individual were elected, and make your decision. Don't just sit on your butt because any given candidate doesn't agree with 100% of your positions.
Don't just sit on your butt because any given candidate doesn't agree with 100% of your positions.
------
Far from it -- and I only vote Republican because they are the CLOSEST to my view of what is needed in this nation, not personal, selfish desires. And I am certainly not a radical Republican (whatever that might be) --- in fact even though I vote Repub like you, I don't really call myself a Republican anymore -- in many respects, I am embarassed to -- I, like many Americans, am a CONSTITUIONAL CONSERVATIVE, liberal on some social issues, fiscally very conservative, and very conservative on anything that challenges the definition of America as laid down by our framers or that would remove the established, settled freedoms and liberties of REAL AMERICANS.
So there. That is my position and proud of it, and proud to be an American PATRIOT.
"Pirro is pro abortion, anti gun, pro gay agenda, pro affirmative action, and pro unrestricted immigration"
The above are representative issues for typical New York voters. However, national security should absolutely be the prime issue, and restricted immigration is directly related to national security. If Pirro has common sense leadership and rational discourse, she will prove this vital point to NYers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.