Dicker from the NYPost? He is not only an idiot--he's intellectually dishonest. Last night was asked to comment on missus clinton's poll numbers that had dropped like a brick when Jeanine announced her candidacy. Dicker cited a supposed counterexample. But that poll was taken BEFORE Jeanine entered the race.
So my question is this: Why did Chris Wallace (who was subbing for Brit Hume) book this obvious (s)hill to discuss the Jeanine entry? And why didn't Wallace follow up on Dicker's "error"????
This will be interesting to see play out. I was listening to Hannity on the way home yesterday and he had Susan Estrich on. The first thing out of her large mouth was the legal problems with Pirro's husband. When Hannity reminded her that despite disbarrment, impeachment, etc..., the left told us that Hillary should be judged on her own and not by the actions of her husband, Estrich then blamed Hannity for bringing up the issue (WTF?!) but kept reiterating that Pirro's husband makes her unelectable.
I saw Chris Wallace last night and was appalled at the way he reported Pirro's entry into the race. He acted like Hill's lapdog. Slobber, slobber.