Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adorno

"To say that gravity brought all of the material of the universe together into a tiny ball before the Big Bang is to say that before that tiny ball there was a different kind of universe with all kinds of material scattered about, and therefore the universe didn't begin with the Big Bang."

Correct me if I’m wrong, but that isn’t necessarily out of the question is it? The Big Bang only really accounts for our 'current' universe.


100 posted on 08/16/2005 12:48:49 PM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: FostersExport
The Big Bang only really accounts for our 'current' universe.

Then you and I may be in agreement that the universe didn't begin with the Big Bang. There was definetely something there before the 'current universe'. But then, shouldn't everything that ever was, including time and the current and previous iterations and versions of the universe be called 'the universe'?
119 posted on 08/16/2005 12:59:51 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: malakhi

placemarker


234 posted on 08/16/2005 2:39:33 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson