To: Pete
"Your proposition seems to assume that existence is preferable to non-existence. What is the basis for that preference? "
Are you implying non-existence is preferable? You know, there's always an easy out if you think that.
135 posted on
08/16/2005 1:12:33 PM PDT by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: furball4paws
You know, there's always an easy out if you think that.**************
Ouch.
269 posted on
08/16/2005 3:33:49 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkes.)
To: furball4paws
Are you implying non-existence is preferable? You know, there's always an easy out if you think that. I not implying anything. I am asking. Specifically, I am asking why an atheist and evolutionist would prefer one over the other. I have yet to get a satisfactory answer.
403 posted on
08/16/2005 7:58:02 PM PDT by
Pete
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson