Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pierce Brosnan Out As James Bond, 007
Yahoo News ^

Posted on 08/17/2005 10:56:03 AM PDT by Republican Red

NEW YORK - A single, surprising phone call and it was over. That's how Pierce Brosnan says he learned that his services as James Bond would no longer be required.

"One phone call, that's all it took!" the 52-year-old actor tells Entertainment Weekly magazine in its Aug. 19 issue.

Brosnan starred in four Bond films. He says that before they stopped negotiations, the producers had invited him back for a fifth time.

"You know, the movie career for me really started with Bond," says Brosnan, acknowledging that by the time "GoldenEye" premiered in 1995, he was already 42.

He then starred as 007 in "Tomorrow Never Dies" (1997), "The World Is Not Enough" (1999) and "Die Another Day" (2002).

His departure from the role was a "titanic jolt to the system," says Brosnan, followed by "a great sense of calm."

"I thought. ... I can do anything I want to do now. I'm not beholden to them or anyone. I'm not shackled by some contracted image. So there was a sense of liberation."

Brosnan says he's grateful to have had the role, but adds: "It never felt real to me. I never felt I had complete ownership over Bond. Because you'd have these stupid one-liners — which I loathed — and I always felt phony doing them."

He plays a foulmouthed, skirt-chasing hit man in the upcoming film "The Matador."

"(For this) to come on the heels of my departure from the world of Bond is sweet grace, to play this one as a farewell to that chapter in time — it certainly wasn't planned."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jamesbond
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: Republican Red

I've been hearing for awhile, since the last flick, that Bosnan no longer wanted to do the Bond flicks. I saw him on an interview, maybe 2-3 months ago, where he was positive he was no longer going to do another Bond, and that he was absolutely glad that it was over.


21 posted on 08/17/2005 11:11:04 AM PDT by mountn man (Everyone brings joy into a room. Some when they enter. Others when they leave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Already posted: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1465130/posts


22 posted on 08/17/2005 11:11:36 AM PDT by ecurbh (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
I hated Moonraker, maybe because I had read the book and it was not even remotely like it.

I do agree about Dalton tho, he was a weak second best to Sean Connery, nevertheless better than all the others.

I remember Ian Fleming was not happy with Connery at first but after seeing him in "Dr. No" he changed his mind.

23 posted on 08/17/2005 11:11:55 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Brosnan wasn't a bad Bond but by the time he came on the whole series had turned into nothing more than a real life cartoon. The scripts stopped even pretending to be plausible back in the early Moore days.


24 posted on 08/17/2005 11:12:06 AM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

save


25 posted on 08/17/2005 11:12:14 AM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
I thought they already signed Clive Owens to be the next Bond. At any rate, the series needs a serious re-tooling. Die Another Day was laughably bad, IMO.

How about adding...oh, I don't know...some suspense, instead of really bad CGI effects.

26 posted on 08/17/2005 11:12:38 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
The Living Daylights was good, but Dalton really faltered in License To Kill. WAY too dark for Bond, and not many of the glitzy international spots etc. we anticipate with Bond. I think Timothy Dalton took the role too seriously, but then Roger Moore seemed to see it as a joke, polyester leisure suits and all!
27 posted on 08/17/2005 11:13:15 AM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

there were 5, not 4.
you forget the oft forgotten George Lazemby, from "on her majesty's secret service" he did just the one movie.
oddly enough, the most often forgotten actor who played bond, is the only one who was actually english.


28 posted on 08/17/2005 11:13:44 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

I always thought that Mel Gibson would have made a great Bond. I guess Mel is now too old to play Bond.


29 posted on 08/17/2005 11:14:19 AM PDT by Ticonderoga34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
"you forget the oft forgotten George Lazemby, from "on her majesty's secret service"

Didn't Peter Sellers (or was it David Niven?) play Bond in the quazi-comedy Casino Royale?

30 posted on 08/17/2005 11:15:48 AM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
oddly enough, the most often forgotten actor who played bond, is the only one who was actually englis

Yes but in the books Bond was actually Scottish like Sean Connery. Actually half Scottish and half Swiss.

31 posted on 08/17/2005 11:16:32 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
"I thought. ... I can do anything I want to do now. I'm not beholden to them or anyone. I'm not shackled by some contracted image. So there was a sense of liberation."

What an ungrateful jerk. I remember when he was on Remington Steele and complaining that he should be picked as the next James Bond. He whined about that forever.

32 posted on 08/17/2005 11:17:38 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

I thought it was Woody Allen who played "Jimmy Bond".


33 posted on 08/17/2005 11:18:05 AM PDT by akorahil (consider this space filled with yet another witty and irreverent tag line instead of this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Nobody by Sean.


34 posted on 08/17/2005 11:18:53 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Clive Owen is supposedly the frontrunner.


35 posted on 08/17/2005 11:19:37 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: zert_28

I thought the same thing back in the 90s! He would have been the perfect age back then, but you're right, he's too old for the part now.


36 posted on 08/17/2005 11:20:00 AM PDT by reegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: somerville

No, no, no. Clive Owen. He's not a pretty boy like Brosnan is, but is still very handsome and devonair.


37 posted on 08/17/2005 11:20:43 AM PDT by elc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Brosnan was clearly the second best Bond. Lazenby was a hunk of beef, Moore was a sneering elitist, and Dalton was colorless.

Connery, of course, was the best Bond. Probably always will be.


38 posted on 08/17/2005 11:21:11 AM PDT by Scourge of God (What goes here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thrusher

I though they were going with a female bond this time.
Halley Berry was mentioned a few times.


39 posted on 08/17/2005 11:21:45 AM PDT by Holicheese (Would you like a beer? No thanks, I will have a bud light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I love Clive Owen (have loved him since Gosford Park), but I think Mr. Parker is a little more patrician, an asset in the Bond role. But I could live with Clive if I had to.


40 posted on 08/17/2005 11:22:01 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson