Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Intelligent Design Hurts Conservatives (By making us look like crackpots)
The New Republic ^ | 8/16/05 | Ross Douthat

Posted on 08/18/2005 5:17:34 PM PDT by curiosity

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 941-953 next last
To: gathersnomoss
I for one will take morality over science in a heart beat.

That's like saying that you will take chicken soup over an ergonomic keyboard. It makes no sense. They're two different concepts that address different things. There's no "choosing" one over the other.

When was the last time you saw a book burned in this country

I'm sure that there are more recent ones, but this article relates the story of one that occured in 2003.

I believe that Janet and Bill were both playing with themselves while women and children were burned to death.

This has nothing to do with the current discussion.

Not very moral. My I suggest that this event was more like Hitler taking on the Jews. And the government didn't give a sXXt. I guess it was for the chulrun...you know it takes a fxxking village.

Do you have a relevant statement to make, or are you just going to blather on about totally unrelated subjects?

Screw the flaming liberals and their creationism. I go with ID. They will loose!

What about the theory of evolution?

Words that mean nothing. Actions that should wake many of you up. If you believe that we all came about because of a big BANG and that the gorilla at the zoo is a distant cousin than you do in fact have alot to be afraid of. Fear the unknown.

Do you have a coherent argument to make, with facts and logic employed, or are you just going to set up an oversimplified strawman, swat at it with argument from incredulity and dance away?
181 posted on 08/18/2005 6:56:54 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Intelligent design is not creationism. Rather it is an more open question.


182 posted on 08/18/2005 6:57:17 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Practically speaking, what would Intelligent Design believers do differently than others, in the lab?

Real IDers don't need no stinkin' lab. They already know all the answers!

183 posted on 08/18/2005 6:57:58 PM PDT by onewhowatches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
Evolution does not address the creation of life since, as a scientific endeavor, the research activities called science, a methodology of inquiry, has stipulated that the supernatural is beyond science's ability.

First of all I didn't state that evolution addresses the creation of life, I merely corrected a statement made by a fellow poster. Second of all science does address the creation of life and there are numerous fields studying same. Some names given to these fields of study are Chemical Evolution, Abiogenesis and once upon a time Spontaneous Generation.

But thanks for the lecture.

184 posted on 08/18/2005 6:58:15 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

Wrong?

The theory of intelligent design (ID) holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. ID is thus a scientific disagreement with the core claim of evolutionary theory that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion

Notice the word CERTAIN. I will let you figure out the rest.


185 posted on 08/18/2005 6:58:26 PM PDT by aft_lizard (This space waiting for a post election epiphany it now is: Question Everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: js1138
You are saying that an omniscient didn't foresee all this?

Of course not...but God gave man free will...or else man would not be human but a robot and man choose his fate, in addtion because God KNEW what man would choose He KNEW that He would sacrifice His only Son and His Son offered His life freely to reestablish the relationship between God and his Creation

Why?

One word

Love

186 posted on 08/18/2005 6:59:02 PM PDT by apackof2 (In my simple way, I guess you could say I'm living in the BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Where?
The Earth became formless and void?
darkness became over the surface of the deep?
or, the Spirit of God became over the surface of the waters?

What are "the waters" do you know?

Isaiah 45:18 For thus saith the LORD That created the heavens; God Himself That formed the earth and made it; He hath established it, He created it "NOT" in vain, He formed it to be inhabited: "I am the LORD; and there is none else.

This "not in vain" is the same Hebrew word as without form = waste.

Something happened to cause this earth to become void and without form.

And the Spirit of God "MOVED" upon the face of the waters.

This word "MOVED" is not the same word as "vain" and/or "without form". The word "MOVED" a prim. root: to brood, by impl. to be relaxed: -flutter, move, shake.

Jeremiah 4:22 For My people is foolish, they have not known ME; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge.

My dictionary says "science" is having knowledge.

23 I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.

24 I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.

25 I beheld, and lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.

26 I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by His fierce anger.


Some do try and claim this is talking about Noah's flood, however, this says no man and there were at least 8 souls on Noah's ark.
187 posted on 08/18/2005 6:59:11 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

My Ford Explorer Sport Trac is made from metal, petroleum products and rubber. All these things were here before man arrived on the scene. How come cars weren't here waiting for us when man showed up on this planet? A car is nowhere near as complex and complicated as the human body. If human beings can evolve from "cosmic dust," it seems it wouldn't have been a big thing to have cars here waiting for us when we showed up. Maybe the wind wasn't blowing from the right direction.


188 posted on 08/18/2005 6:59:20 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

In my mind, both the "Sponeaneous combustion" crowd and the folks who believe that Genesis is the absolute literal definitive true fact of how it happened are wrong........

or maybe they're both a little bit right:


EXTRATERRESTRIALS? THE VATICAN SAID 'YES'

The death of Pope John Paul II has occasioned widespread discussions about his own stand and the Vatican's position regarding a variety of subjects, from purely theological to social issues. Completely lacking has been any reference to an issue of concern to many, and especially to those interested in the subjects of UFO's, Life on other planets, and Extraterrestrials in general, and in Zecharia Sitchin's writings in particular.

As it happened, it was exactly five years ago, in April 2000, that Zecharia engaged in a public discussion of those very issues with a leading theologian of the Vatican, Monsignor Corrado Balducci, during an international conference held in Bellaria (Bimini) in Italy. The historic dialogue was reported at the time on this official website of Zecharia Sitchin; hereunder is the full text of that report which speaks for itself.



Dialogue in Bellaria

SITCHIN AND VATICAN THEOLOGIAN DISCUSS UFO's,
EXTRATERRESTRIALS, ANGELS, CREATION OF MAN

Report by Zecharia Sitchin

In what must be a historic first, a high official of the Vatican and a Hebrew scholar discussed the issue of Extraterrestrials and the Creation of Man, and though different from each other in upbringing, background, religion and methodology, nevertheless arrived at common conclusions:

* Yes, Extraterrestrials can and do exist on other planets
* Yes, they can be more advanced than us
* Yes, materially, Man could have been fashioned from a pre-existing sentient being.

The Participants

The high Vatican official was Monsignor Corrado Balducci, a Catholic theologian with impressive credentials: A member of the Curia of the Roman Catholic Church, a Prelate of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples and the Propagation of the Faith, leading exorcist of the Archdiocese of Rome, a member of the Vatican's Beatification Committee, an expert on Demonology and the author of several books. Appointed in the Vatican to deal with the issue of UFO's and Extraterrestrials, he has made in recent years pronouncements indicating a tolerance of the subjects; but he has never before met and had a dialogue with a Hebrew scholar, and gone beyond prescribed formulations to include the touchy issue of the Creation of Man.

The Hebrew scholar was me -- Zecharia Sitchin: A researcher of ancient civilizations, a biblical archaeologist, a descendant of Abraham…
The Monsignor and I almost met for such a dialogue last December, but it did not come about. This time we were scheduled to meet in Bellaria, Italy, at a conference whose theme was “The Mystery of Human Existence.” I arrived there with my wife and a score of fans from the USA, on March 31st, scheduled to address the audience of over a thousand the next day. The Monsignor was nowhere in sight; but he was there the next morning to hear my presentation. “I drove the whole night from Rome to hear you,” he said.

Sitchin’s Presentation

My talk, ably translated by my Italian editor Tuvia Fogel, included a slide presentation that added a pictorial dimension to the evidence from ancient times in support of Sumerian texts, on which my eight books based the following conclusions:

We are not alone -- not just in the vast universe, but in our own solar system; There is one more planet in our solar system, orbiting beyond Pluto but nearing Earth periodically; Advanced "Extraterrestrials” -- the Sumerians called them Anunnaki, the Bible Nefilim -- started to visit our planet some 450,000 years ago; And, some 300,000 years ago, they engaged in genetic engineering to upgrade Earth's hominids and fashion Homo sapiens, the Adam. In that, they acted as Emissaries for the Universal Creator -- God.

The Dialogue

"We have much to talk about,” Msgr. Balducci said to me as he came forward to congratulate me on my presentation; "I have great esteem for your scholarship," he said.

We returned to the hotel for lunch. Our table was surrounded in a semi-circle by my American fans, intent on not missing a word of the forthcoming dialogue. In the hours-long session, Msgr. Balducci outlined the positions he was going to state, from a prepared text, in his talk the next day. While my approach was based on physical evidence, his was a purely Roman Catholic theological-philosophical one, seeking the spiritual aspects. Yet, our conclusions converged.

Msgr. Balducci's Positions

ON UFO's. "There must be something in it." The hundreds and thousands of eyewitness reports leave no room for denying that there is a measure of truth in them, even allowing for optical illusions, atmospheric phenomena and so on. As a Catholic theologian such witnessing cannot be dismissed. "Witnessing is one way of transmitting truth, and in the case of the Christian religion, we are talking about a Divine Revelation in which witnessing is crucial to the credibility of our faith.”

ON LIFE ON OTHER PLANETS: “That life may exist on other planets is certainly possible... The Bible does not rule out that possibility. On the basis of scripture and on the basis of our knowledge of God's omnipotence, His wisdom being limitless, we must affirm that life on other planets is possible." Moreover, this is not only possible, but also credible and even probable. '"Cardinal Nicolo Cusano (1401-1464) wrote that there is not a single star in the sky about which we can rule out the existence of life, even if different from ours.”

ON INTELLIGENT EXTRATERRESTRIALS: "When I talk about Extraterrestrials, we must think of beings who are like us -- more probably, beings more advanced than us, in that their nature is an association of a material part and a spiritual part, a body and a soul, although in different proportions than human beings on Earth." Angels are beings who are purely spiritual, devoid of bodies, while we are made up of spirit and matter but still at a low level. "It is entirely credible that in the enormous distance between Angels and humans, there could be found some middle stage, that is beings with a body like ours but more elevated spiritually. If such intelligent beings really exist on other planets, only science will be able to prove; but in spite of what some people think, we would be in a position to reconcile their existence with the Redemption that Christ has brought us.”

The Anunnaki and the Creation of Man

Well then, I asked Msgr. Balducci, does it mean that my presentation was no great revelation to you? We appear to agree, I said, that more advanced extraterrestrials can exist, and I use science to evidence their coming to Earth ...I then quote the Sumerian texts that say that the Anunnaki (“Those who from heaven to Earth came”) genetically improved an existing being on Earth to create the being that the Bible calls Adam.

My conclusion regarding your presentation, Msgr. Balducci answered, is that more than anything else your whole approach is based on physical evidence, it concerns itself with matter, not with spirit. This is an important distinction, "because if this distinction is made, I can bring up the view of the great theologian, Professor Father Marakoff, who is still alive and is greatly respected by the Church. He formulated the hypothesis that when God created Man and put the soul into him, perhaps what is meant is not that Man was created from mud or lime, but from something pre-existing, even from a sentient being capable of feeling and perception. So the idea of taking a pre-man or hominid and creating someone who is aware of himself is something that Christianity is coming around to…The key is the distinction between the material body and the soul granted by God."

From Anunnaki to God

Yes, I responded to the Vatican theologian, in my writings I deal with the physical evidence; but already in my first book (The 12th Planet), the very last sentence of the last paragraph raises the question: If the Extraterrestrials "created" us, who created them on their planet?

From this my own thinking and the contents of my subsequent books evolved toward the spiritual or "divine" aspects. The Anunnaki, I have explained, were just emissaries (and that is what the Hebrew word Malachim, translated Angels, means). They thought that it was their decision to come here for selfish reasons and to fashion us because they needed workers; but in truth they only carried out the Almighty God's wishes and plans.

If such Extraterrestrials were so involved, Msgr. Balducci said, even by your own interpretation they had to do with Man's physics, body and rationality: but God alone had to do with the Soul!

My second book, that deals with Man's aspiration to ascend the heavens, is titled The Stairway to Heaven, I told Msgr, Balducci, "it seems to me that we are ascending the same stairway to heaven, though from different steps," I said.

We ended the dialogue as friends, determined to stay in touch and continue.




Reproduction is permitted if accompanied by the statement

© Z. Sitchin 2005
Reproduced by permission.


189 posted on 08/18/2005 6:59:36 PM PDT by Chuckster (Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apackof2
What God created was perfect...you are forgetting what man "created"......sin

So God's perfect creation created sin.

Why would a perfect creation create sin?
190 posted on 08/18/2005 6:59:36 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
It seems to me that in every crevice of missing knowledge and understanding of science, there is room for a Creator.

That extremely bad theology. Also known as "God of the gaps." If God can only hide in the "crevices of missing knowledge", then the amount of space allocated to him is going to decline exponetially over time. Science has a tendency of filling those "crevices," you know. Right now, those crevices are very few in number. In a few years, they will be even fewer.

What happens if one day scientists are able to create a simple life form in the lab? It may happen. There is no a priori reason to think it won't happen. What would happen to your faith if it did? It would not shake mine.

191 posted on 08/18/2005 7:00:51 PM PDT by curiosity (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Is your Ford Explorer Sport Trac -- or any Ford Explorer Sprot Trac -- capable of making an imperfect copy of itself, either on its own or with the aid of another Ford Explorer Sport Trac?


192 posted on 08/18/2005 7:01:13 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: apackof2
"The theory of evolution may be in big trouble, according to no less an authority than Charles Darwin, its founder. “If it could be demonstrated,” he once wrote, “that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, excessive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” "

None has been found. In fact there is so much evidence to the contrary, that this point is no longer a consideration. Now the mechanisms are known well enough, that this statement has been relegated to the "proof of a negative" catagory.

193 posted on 08/18/2005 7:04:21 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Friend of thunder
If the supernatural exists than science must be able to explain it.

Science is the study of the natural and only the natural. Anything supernatural is outside of the explanatory power of science by definition.
194 posted on 08/18/2005 7:04:33 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

Mine hasn't evolved that far yet but I'll check with the Ford on how these things come about.


195 posted on 08/18/2005 7:06:09 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
God could have created a world in which there was no death, no pain, nothing negative.

He might have called it "Eden."

196 posted on 08/18/2005 7:06:17 PM PDT by syriacus (Cindy doesn't want our soldiers to shoot insurgent bombers who are murdering small Iraqi children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Intelligent design is not without science to back it up, and objective reasoning to support it

Then perahps you can provide references to this "science" that backs up ID?
197 posted on 08/18/2005 7:06:33 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: webboy45
It's the flaws in a blue diamond that give it the beautiful blue color (ie. electron holes).

No, it's the boron.

Type IIb: These diamonds contain no nitrogen - but they contain boron, which absorbs red, orange and yellow light. These diamonds therefore usually appear to be blue, although they can also be grey or nearly colorless. All naturally blue diamonds belong to Type IIb, which makes up 0.1% of all diamonds.

198 posted on 08/18/2005 7:07:02 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Is your Ford Explorer Sport Trac -- or any Ford Explorer Sprot [sic] Trac -- capable of making an imperfect copy of itself, either on its own or with the aid of another Ford Explorer Sport Trac?

My F350 spits on your Ford Explorer Sport Trac.

Besides this argument shows you are very ignorant of science, evolution, and other closely related subjects. Analogies should relate!

199 posted on 08/18/2005 7:07:33 PM PDT by onewhowatches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Mine hasn't evolved that far yet

Evolution only occurs on things that replicate imperfectly. If your motor vehicle cannot do that, then evolution can't occur with it and your analogy is completely invalid.
200 posted on 08/18/2005 7:07:40 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 941-953 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson