Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie

So if the natural life span is about 100, why not get there intact? Is it really extending the natural life span or achieving the natural life span in relatively good shape what is motivating the whole stem cell thing. I don't see it as selfish to want that and don't see wanting that as being harmful to our children et al. Unless of course they just want our money and want to have less payout of benefits to old people. And that is understandable but craven. I prefer my craveness to theirs any day.


757 posted on 08/19/2005 8:32:12 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 755 | View Replies ]


To: cajungirl
It is the 150 or more natural life span which disturbs me. If that happens, we might go the way of the Spartans. We should NOT go there.
759 posted on 08/19/2005 8:36:29 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 757 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson