I question why evolutionism makes positive statements about unobserved, unrecorded history and thereby thinks it has a right to piggyback on the name of science.
Scripter writes in response:
That's an excellent point to ponder.
So, scripter.. what do you think of criminals convicted solely on the basis of forensic evidence?
Should they be let out of prison?
Yes or No?
After all nobody saw them commit the crime.
Are you saying you agree with the poster that said "evolutionism makes positive statements about unobserved, unrecorded history?"