Scripter writes: "I appreciate you sharing your opinion."
While we're sharing:
http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/natsci/vertpaleo/fhc/firstCM.htm
http://campus.northpark.edu/physics//bts3910/schimmrich/horses.html
http://www.cruzio.com/~cscp/index.htm
Some of the links I used are below - I've tried to clean up the links but I'm sure some of the links are no longer working.
http://www.uky.edu/Ag/Horsemap
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/horses/
http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf033/sf033p14.htm
http://www.equinestudies.org/historical.htm
http://www.horseracingdirectories.com/horse_evolution_4_.html
http://www.freethought-web.org/ctrl/gould_fact-and-theory.html
http://home.primus.com.au/bonno/evolution10.htm
http://www.mirthe.org/interests/evolution.php
http://www.aqd.nps.gov/grd/geology/paleo/paleo_4_1
http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/6733_creation_or_evolution_12_7_2000.asp
http://www.ebonmusings.org/evolution/evoevidence.html
http://www.hku.hk/philodep/courses/max/Phil2130/l12-14.html
http://www.ecotao.com/holism/bp.htm
The study left me with more questions. If the evolution of the horse was the premier of evolution at one point, then the TOE was in much worse shape than I first realized.