[Moby Grape]

"Oh it's damage alright and Pat is so far out of line it's unbelievable. But I doubt with the bloodlust at a high among Republicans unfortunately you won't see much condemnation of Pat."

What a DUMB remark. I will grant that it may not be the best judgment for a minister to utter such, but it is idiotic to suggest that taking out a terrorist is "bloodlust". The head-in-sand Libertarian view of the world is akin to what the world faced before WW11, and the lack of proactive dealing with the despot Hitler resulted in MILLIONS upon MILLIONS dying. This cover-our-eyes-and-ears thinking can be DEADLY...to us.

[billbears]

No, it's bloodlust. You can justify it any way you want but pre-emptive wars have never been the standard. We have either what ifs involving WWII from the pre-emptive war crowd that have never been and could never be tested. Or we have actual historical evidence of Wilson needlessly getting this nation involved in WWI, in a war that was none of our business. How's that last 80 years of nonstop war and police actions worked out for us?

I can't honestly believe that anyone, especially a so-called Christian pastor, would advocate assasination of anyone. A wrong will never create a right.