Gee, that's an argument. Perhaps you misunderstood me. I do not mean that he should be censored or banned, merely that he does not have the skills (or has not developed them) requisite to being a good talk show host.
The market is the judge of that, not you.
Perhaps this is painfully obvious, but I am a part of the market, therefore my opinion that he is not qualified to do a three-hour show is quite valid. In short, I am a consumer. That's who I am to say whether or not he is qualified.
Are you sure you're 'qualified' to post here? Seesh. I don't know. Maybe you can tell me /sarcasm
Just as a wild, wild guess, you've been Hannitized, right?
| What a dumb statement. Gee, that's an argument. It's called an introduction, an attention catcher. It seems to have served its purpose. The market is the judge of that, not you. Perhaps this is painfully obvious, but I am a part of the market, therefore my opinion that he is not qualified to do a three-hour show is quite valid. In short, I am a consumer. That's who I am to say whether or not he is qualified. The market is a single entity. You are a part of it like a passenger on a ship. You can choose to be on the ship, or not, but your input as to the course it takes is for all practical purposes, completely irrelevant. Your assertions that you are qualified is unsupportable, the market has overridden you. Just as a wild, wild guess, you've been Hannitized, right? Hannitized? Baiting doesn't work well with me . What else you got? |