[Captainpaintball]

Why would anyone in their right mind take the chance of being THE guy that allowed a catastrophic terrorist attack to occur? No matter if it happens in 2009...If a terrorist entered this country from September 12, 2001 to January 20, 2009, Bush will be blamed for it--right or wrong.

I challenge anyone in cyberspace to give me an answer to my original question.

This leads me to subscribe to two theories: A.)This is an orchestrated plan, (insert oneworld theory here) and the Powers That Be will not let a terrorist attack take place because it would screw up those plans, or B.) a terrorist attack IS part of the plan; and Bush's failure won't bother him because it really wouldn't be public. Why? There will be no free media allowed to question the government because liberty would end with a stroke of a pen and an executive order---Martial Law...for the chillllllldren, of course.

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

The answer is B.

After the attack, they will cram through every evil thing they ever wanted, including rushing through the damned North American Community.

For your own good, of course.

[ladyinred]

Are you serious?