Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NautiNurse; All

I've searched the threads for this and can't find info. There was a post about the law that says why the feds couldn't just go into NO and take over. It's some latin name. Does anyone know where I can find that law .


912 posted on 09/05/2005 8:15:03 AM PDT by queenkathy (Dear God, I have a problem; it's me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 908 | View Replies ]


To: queenkathy

try post 652, then let us know if you still have questions.


916 posted on 09/05/2005 8:16:14 AM PDT by NautiNurse (The task before us is enormous, but so is the heart of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 912 | View Replies ]

To: queenkathy
There was a post about the law that says why the feds couldn't just go into NO and take over. It's some latin name. Does anyone know where I can find that law .

Lots of posts on the general subject. The law you are referring to is Possee Comitatus, and forbds the use of active duty military to perform civilian police function.

The National Guard is not active-duty military, and can be used as the civil authorities (governor) direct. Federalizing of a National Guard response is possible, but requires either a request from the governor, or the governor to be in violation of federal law (e.g., use of Fed Nat'l Guard to enforce school bussing). The President offered to have this disaster response (actually, just NOLA) federalized, and Blaco turned down the offer.

945 posted on 09/05/2005 8:29:10 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 912 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson