To: Naomi4
The military does not really have jurisdiction over the civil authorities to forcibly evict people from their homes. I don't dispute that. I'm just suggesting that if the military doesn't have the jurisdiction to evict people from their homes, they sure as hell have no business airlifting Happy Meals to stubborn people who insist on staying in their homes in a city that no longer exists.
249 posted on
09/07/2005 8:23:06 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
To: Alberta's Child
<> << I'm just suggesting that if the military doesn't have the jurisdiction to evict people from their homes, they sure as hell have no business airlifting Happy Meals to stubborn people who insist on staying in their homes in a city that no longer exists.>> They would have no choice. It would be terrible PR for them to leave the people there and not to give them food or water to sustain them.
274 posted on
09/07/2005 8:38:13 AM PDT by
Naomi4
To: Alberta's Child
I don't dispute that. I'm just suggesting that if the military doesn't have the jurisdiction to evict people from their homes, they sure as hell have no business airlifting Happy Meals to stubborn people who insist on staying in their homes in a city that no longer exists. You need some happy meals. A large portion of this city is relatively unaffected and you would know that if you weren't eating the media SWILL.
416 posted on
09/08/2005 7:43:31 AM PDT by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson