To: RDTF
So you can bear arms to protect someone else's property, but not your own? If someone hires armed guards to protect their house, do they still go to the house and confiscate the owner's weapons?
20 posted on
09/08/2005 3:46:38 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
The feds are still not in charge, right? If not, then it's coming from the state level. Anyone know what the law is on this?
25 posted on
09/08/2005 3:48:35 PM PDT by
RDTF
To: tacticalogic
looks like these folks need help forming delaware corps.
36 posted on
09/08/2005 3:53:00 PM PDT by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: tacticalogic
"So you can bear arms to protect someone else's property, but not your own? If someone hires armed guards to protect their house, do they still go to the house and confiscate the owner's weapons?"
First question: Yes. Second question: No.
constitutional rights apply only to people who are rich enough to buy them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson