To: wagglebee
I like Tancredo's idea of putting a third-party in charge of the relief money, the 'Rats have a bad track record.
3 posted on
09/12/2005 5:29:22 PM PDT by
FlashBack
(www.teamamericapac.org)
To: FlashBack
7 posted on
09/12/2005 5:30:41 PM PDT by
FlashBack
(www.teamamericapac.org)
To: FlashBack
The only problem with putting a third party in charge (such as the Salvation Army or Red Cross) is that these groups don't have the manpower or infrastructure to deal with $60+ billion. The additional overhead to them would eat up a sizable portion of the money, it's FEMA's job, let them do it.
8 posted on
09/12/2005 5:33:47 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: FlashBack
I like Tancredo's idea of putting a third-party in charge of the relief money, the 'Rats have a bad track record.I agree.
Simple, common sense. {with the fate of a snowball in Hell in Washington}
20 posted on
09/12/2005 5:50:40 PM PDT by
labette
(A living, breathing, constitution is the model of doublespeak.)
To: FlashBack
The U.N.,the NAACP? /sarcasm off
34 posted on
09/12/2005 8:39:25 PM PDT by
not2worry
(What goes around comes around!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson