[bjc]

This is a much stronger argument and shows some real analysis of the documents.

Roberts now responds: Not Habeas Corpus but multiple and repetitive Habeas Corpae (?). He uses Judge Friendly as the justiciation for addressing the issue. Feingold says you want to abolish it. Roberts says no - avoid making it a source of delay and avoidance of responsibility.

Then Roberts carefuilly avoids agreeing with Feingold's misleading summary: He says nothing.

[ChadGore]

[Gritty]

Roberts - "I disagree with your premise..."

[gopwinsin04]

Russ tries to trap Judge Roberts by asking a general question about health care law. He slaps him down like a gnat.

Now on to more ADA law questions...