Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Ruckus of Dogs

The problem seems to be one of distinguishing real events from the " exploito-journalism " they churn out on a daily basis.
These junior "journalists" descend on a news story with formulized recipes for "scooping " each other with one more outrageous "angle" after another...many of them refined from past psuedo-news stories like Sheehan or The Peterson Thing, Aruba, or a juicy Michael Jackson mini-series...each one desparate for an attention grabbing sensational contrived "bulletin" that either they can blurt out during live coverage with the wind and rain and coconuts flying or alternatively some georgeous news "doll'" back at studio can drone on as she reads the "stuff" rolling before her uncomprehending eyes back at studio. They call it "news". It's really "infotainment"...content free pap...cotton candy reporting ,all fluff,titillation and "film -at-eleven" jive.


18 posted on 09/15/2005 6:24:03 AM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: CBart95
I agree with everything you said. It's ridiculous that Natalee Holloway, Scott Peterson, and Michael Jackson can command months of national news. These cases might be relevant in the states they are happening in, but they don't deserve hours of broadcast in mine. That goes for FOX news too.

The "news dolls" all look alike. Bleached hair and so much makeup it looks like it's dripping off. Ugh.

The only really good news program is The Newshour. No ads and no tabloid fluff either.

34 posted on 09/15/2005 8:31:42 AM PDT by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson