[King Prout]

The Second Amendment raises interesting questions about a constitutional interpretation. I read the Second Amendment as providing an individual right to keep and bear arms as opposed to only a collective right. Individual Americans have a constitutional right to own and use guns. And there are a number of actions that legislatures should not take in my view to restrict gun ownership.

um, seems he said it loud and clear right there

[King Prout]

nope, my bad, sorry.
that's still Feingold speaking.

[RockinRight]

Actually, according to this, FEINGOLD said that, which shocked me.

[spunkets]

"um, seems he said it loud and clear right there"

Yes he did. He's Fiengold though and he doesn't mean what you think it means.

[Atlas Sneezed]

I read the Second Amendment as providing an individual right to keep and bear arms as opposed to only a collective right. Individual Americans have a constitutional right to own and use guns. And there are a number of actions that legislatures should not take in my view to restrict gun ownership."

u"m, seems he said it loud and clear right there

---

Sorry, but this allows for all sorts of present and future infringements that are supported by the Dems, Bush (both) and others, such as John "Reasonable Restrictions" Ashcroft.

Lip service, while they are sustaining the sell-out of our rights.