So you've decided you don't like evolution based on what you heard about it from people who know as little about it as you do.
Great. Just great.
So you've decided you don't like evolution based on what you heard about it from people who know as little about it as you do. Great. Just great.
***Oh, good one. Ridicule. You must be a true holy warrior. Take comfort. I decided I don't like evolution based upon several things, and yes, one of them was from how I heard about it and the fact that they were abusing their authority when they proceeded with it. It is a case of haps folks not policing their own. But some of it was on the basis of reading both sides of the controversy, which I enjoy doing. Some of it was by wearing it as a philosophy (I used to be an evolutionist) and finding that there really was very little that kept me from becoming a lawless individual if I wanted to carry it forward. Some of it is with experience. Some of it is with instinct. Some of it is still undecided. If mainstream science can't convince the president that teaching this stuff side by side is a bad idea, I doubt your ridicule and scorn would be the straw that breaks the camel's back. So why don't we discuss this social policy issue on its merits?
Don't get poisoned!