Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwin Goes to Church
Washington Post ^ | 9/18/2005 | Rev. Henry G. Brinton

Posted on 09/20/2005 5:35:52 PM PDT by curiosity

Most adult Sunday school classes don't raise eyebrows, but my church is planning to hold one that's sure to. It's called "Evolution for Christians," and it will be taught this winter by David Bush, a member of the church I lead, Fairfax Presbyterian. David is an articulate government retiree who has been interested in this topic for nearly two decades, teaches a class on theories of the origins of life every five years or so, and once again has really done his homework. His view is that science and religion answer two different sets of questions about creation, with science answering the "how" questions, and religion answering the "why" ones. "With a little bit of wisdom and tolerance on each side," he tells me, "I think they can complement rather than contradict each other."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allcrevoallthetime; christianity; creation; crevo; crevolist; crevorepublic; darwinism; enoughalready; evolution; religion; unbelief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 441-456 next last
To: Suzy Quzy

"I have heard that Darwin denounced evolution on his deathbed, but I have NOT seen it substantiated. Anyone???"


Well if he did there is not an evolutionists on this earth that will admit it. Let me know what you find out.


181 posted on 09/20/2005 9:32:04 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
Just where would that mountain of evidence be ?

Everywhere. In your genes. At your local natural history museum.

So if there is a mountain of evidence, it's not a "theory" anymore...evolution is a fact and the Churches and synagogues should trumpet it...right???

It's a both thoery and a fact. The two things are not mutually exclusive, you know.

And no, Churches and synagogues should not trumpet evolution for the same reason they don't trumpet the theory of quantum mechanics or the germ theory of disease: it is not a matter of faith or morals.

182 posted on 09/20/2005 9:36:39 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: metmom

"Hebrews 6:18 ...it is impossible for God to lie...
It's true that God cannot lie not that He will not. It's not because it's IN His nature not to lie, it's becasue it IS His nature. God is Truth. That is why He cannot lie."

If this is taken literally.
If there is anything that God CANNOT do, He is not God, but simply an immensely powerful being.
God does not lie, because He does not choose to lie, nor need to lie. (Lie to whom anyway?)
An immensely powerful but limited being, limited by anything, is not God - by definition - and not interesting.


183 posted on 09/20/2005 9:41:25 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
Just where would that mountain of evidence be ? So if there is a mountain of evidence, it's not a "theory" anymore...evolution is a fact and the Churches and synagogues should trumpet it...right???

Take a look at the scientific method.

Mountains of evidence makes it a good theory, even a powerful theory. But it never gets beyond a theory. Laymen often mistake the way science works. Facts, for example, are little bits of data, such as rocks are hard (and for advanced students, there is the scale which defines just how hard a particular rock is under a particular condition).

Try this explanation:

Piling up facts is not science--science is facts-and-theories. Facts alone have limited use and lack meaning: a valid theory organizes them into far greater usefulness.

A powerful theory not only embraces old facts and new but also discloses unsuspected facts [Heinlein 1980:480-181].

The fact that individual species evolve (common descent) is no longer disputed. Even the ID folks have mostly accepted it.

The theory of evolution has withstood 150+ years of testing and has not been falsified.

Does this help?

184 posted on 09/20/2005 9:44:53 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Is this a good tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: metmom

You will find theistic evolutionists here. Most do not believe that God fiddles with evolution. Personally it seems a bit unworthy of the creator of the universe to have to tinker with it to keep it running.

Just my opinion.


185 posted on 09/20/2005 9:45:41 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13
Do you believe the Holy Spirit inspired the authors of the Books listed below. The Holy Spirit is part of the Godhead in case you didn't know. Because He is God, He would have to be inspiring foolish errors if what you say were true.

BEWARE, unleashing the Lion of the Tribe of Judah can be harmful to your worldview! (Red letters indicate words spoken by Jesus)

Rom 6:9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.

Rom 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

Rom 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses,...

Rom 5:21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin [is] death; but the gift of God [is] eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

1Cr 15:54-55
54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.
55 O death, where [is] thy sting? O grave, where [is] thy victory?

Mar 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.

Isa 45:12 I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, [even] my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.

Zec 12:1 The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him.

Isa 42:5 Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein:

Isa 45:18 For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I [am] the LORD; and [there is] none else.

Isa 40:21-22
Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth?

Isa 64:4 For since the beginning of the world [men] have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, beside thee, [what] he hath prepared for him that waiteth for him.

Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Gen 5:1 This [is] the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;

Deu 4:32 For ask now of the days that are past, which were before thee, since the day that God created man upon the earth,

Gen 5:5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.

New Testament references to Adam.

Luk 3:38 Which was [the son] of Enos, which was [the son] of Seth, which was [the son] of Adam, which was [the son] of God.

1Cr 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul;

Jud 1:14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,

1Ti 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

Col 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

186 posted on 09/20/2005 10:00:01 PM PDT by bondserv (Creation sings a song of praise, Declaring the wonders of Your ways †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop

Ladies, this comment epitomizes the geocentric and egocentric (self-important) tunnel vision that, IMHO, has cost the cause of Christianity immeasurably... :-(



187 posted on 09/20/2005 10:03:49 PM PDT by TXnMA (Iraq & Afghanistan: Bush's "Bug-Zappers"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
Don't sell it short; this planet is pretty special to Him. It's the one to which He sent His Son to die in order that sinners could be saved by His grace, reconciled to Him for eternity, rather than spend it apart from Him in the outer darkness of hell, as we truly deserve.

And I praise Him for that and have gratefully accepted His marvelous grace!!!

But Jesus wasn't sent here because this planet (or the men-in God's [spirit] image who inhabit it) was/were "pretty special to Him" .

Jesus Himself said that He came "to seek and to save that which was lost".

IOW, God sent his Son here because mankind sinned -- not because this planet or its inhabitants were created any more "special to Him" than any of the rest of his mighty works.

As I said, claiming that this planet (or you or I) are "special creations" is the height of prideful hubris. What right have we to insist that nowhere else in God's vast created universe did he place beings in His own image -- or to insist that, if they were created, that they also sinned?

Being a sinner doesn't make me "special". Being saved by God's grace most certainly does...

188 posted on 09/20/2005 10:07:03 PM PDT by TXnMA (Iraq & Afghanistan: Bush's "Bug-Zappers"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

There are angels and although they were never declared to have been created in God's image, about 1/3 of them did fall. I wonder what the evolutionists would say if a Christian admitted to them that they believed in extra-terrestrial life? Advanced life forms that could travel through space and presumably other dimensions.


189 posted on 09/20/2005 10:29:30 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: All

I enjoy studying the evolution of the outer-bird-bodies we call airplanes, from barely able to fly, to supersonic swallows, in 100 years (1905 to 2005). It is a fine example of survival of the fittest, generation after generation. (All due to random mutation and natural selection, of course.)


190 posted on 09/20/2005 10:50:21 PM PDT by zot (GWB -- four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Actually for hundreds of years we reckoned a "day" to be 12 or so hours of sunlight(depending upon the season and your latitude)and the "night" to be the 12 or so hours of dark. Each day and night was EXACTLY 12 hours, so the actual length of the hours changed. So how many "hours" are there in a "day" as reckoned "from the beginning" did you say there were?

And I guess darkness is the only thing that can go faster than the speed of light, because it has to stay out of lights way! ;)


191 posted on 09/21/2005 12:03:26 AM PDT by Mylo ( scientific discovery is also an occasion of worship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
No. Darwin most certainly did not "denounce" evolution on his deathbed. The kooky lying wife of an Evangelist said he did, but she had never met Darwin (who was a bit of a recluse after traveling around the world). His son, who was AT the deathbed said his fathers last words were "I'm not in the least afraid to die." or some such.

And here is what you will NEVER get, little SuzyQ, scientific theory is not revelation. Scientific theory is open to discussion, interpretation, reinterpretation, and dismissal; it is an explanation of observable phenomenon. Revelation is not open to discussion, it is the word of God. Scientific theory is not dependent upon the one who formulated the theory still believing it is a good theory. If Newton had said on his deathbed "its mass DEVIDED by acceleration" that wouldn't have made his laws of Physics any less true.
192 posted on 09/21/2005 12:13:27 AM PDT by Mylo ( scientific discovery is also an occasion of worship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: js1138

"Why is it that when a creationist wishes to portray an idea as false and worthless, he calls it religion, and when an ID advocate seeks respect, he calls ID science?"
---
For the same reason that when an evolutionist wishes to portray an idea as false and worthless, he calls it religion, and when an evolutionist advocate seeks respect, he calls evolutionary science.


193 posted on 09/21/2005 1:07:35 AM PDT by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
You believe God is subject to (not sovereign over) the laws of nature, the laws He created?

Why would God *need* to violate the laws of nature He created? Why would He create them, and then violate them? I see no need for Him to have done so, because I think that everything we see around us can be explained *within* the physical laws we understand.

Moreover, have you ever witnessed God violate physical laws? If you have, and can document what you witnessed with ironclad proof that physical laws of time or space were violated, then you're holding genuine scientific proof that God exists.

It's been generally accepted by both science and faithful people that science cannot vouch for actions of God. Science cannot measure God on an electronic meter or balance scale.

So if you believe in a God that *used* to violate the physical laws He created, but at some point He stopped doing so, how do you know He still exists? Perhaps He created the universe, and left town? I think that's a fairy tale version of God.

If you believe that God still operates all around us, and He has been constant for all time, then you must view what you read in Genesis through the reality of time and space that we see around is. It's just not possible for God to have created the stars zillions of light years away, and for us to see the light from them, if He created them only a few thousand years ago. That violates the physical laws that God created, and there is no evidence ever seen by anybody that God does such things, so I can't believe it.

The simpler explanation is that Genesis is a grand summary of a vast and infinitely complicated creation, written so that any man can read it and know that God created the universe. That's all it means. It simply cannot be real history, because it simply does not match what we find in Gods creation itself.

A God that snaps his fingers and the universe is in place is a fairy tale. A God that is all around us, and has the patience to spend billions of years patiently working on His creation is an immense, huge, powerful God. That's a God that's powerful enough to live in the entire universe at once. Yours lives in a simple book, transcribed by humans, that you hold in your hand. Your God is tiny, mine is infinite.

194 posted on 09/21/2005 2:44:05 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

[There is no logical reason Protestants can't accept it too.]


You poor Catholics who deny the Word of God and try to reconcile false science and false theology and call God Almighty and His Christ a liar.
Search the scriptures, for they testify of the Christ and disregard the oppositions of science, FALSELY SO CALLED.


195 posted on 09/21/2005 2:50:44 AM PDT by wgeorge2001 (The President is wrong in spending so much for so little, bueracacy destroys all of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
Do you think God is not powerful or smart enough to create every species EXACTLY like he wanted to in the beginning?

If God exists, then the evidence says that He created an ingenious invention we call "evolution" that gave us every species of life we see around us.

Evolution is an incredible invention. It has operated continually, without interruption, for billions of years. It requires no apparent "hands on" operation by God that we can detect and measure.

Life, and evolution, finds and uses it's own energy. It repairs itself. It expands it's reach to new territory.

Can you even imagine a machine created by man to do such a thing?

Evolution is Gods most powerful of inventions. It is all around us. But you can't even imagine it's existence with people right here showing it to you, and that's a sad thing.

196 posted on 09/21/2005 2:52:31 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)

You poor blind conservative, you are only half right and will find the answer in the judgement of God by Christ Jesus our Lord UNLESS you believe how that he died for OUR sins and rose again the third day for your justification;
THE JUST SHALL LIVE BY FAITH. Otherwise, you will suffer the wrath of God which Jesus Christ suffered for all who believe on Him as Saviour and Lord.


197 posted on 09/21/2005 2:56:39 AM PDT by wgeorge2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wgeorge2001
You poor Catholics who deny the Word of God

If God is all-powerful, how come He cannot make Himself understood by all people in the same way? How come an omnipotent God isn't known by all the people of the entire earth?

How did you get to be so lucky to have a perfect understanding of God, and those poor Catholics do not? How come you're so smart, and they're so dumb?

Or, maybe it's the other way round?

198 posted on 09/21/2005 2:57:32 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP
"Why is it that when a creationist wishes to portray an idea as false and worthless, he calls it religion, and when an ID advocate seeks respect, he calls ID science?"
---
For the same reason that when an evolutionist wishes to portray an idea as false and worthless, he calls it religion, and when an evolutionist advocate seeks respect, he calls evolutionary science.

I will leave you to think about that one.

199 posted on 09/21/2005 3:59:00 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13

"An immensely powerful but limited being, limited by anything, is not God - by definition - and not interesting."


IIThessalonians 2:3 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:


Sound powerful enough.


200 posted on 09/21/2005 4:55:42 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 441-456 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson