This is a ridiculous way to argue against Alberto Gonzales and in favor of a originalist justice nominee.
We should all use ideological and constitutional arguments to demand an originalist nominee. Using religious moral values, many of which I believe in personally, is slippery slope.
What I am arguing against is the stupid hysteria that Bush is going to appoint Gonzales, or that Roberts would be another Souter, when there has never been a shred of evidence for any of it.
And who the hell does this guy think he is to speak for the conservative base? ("To us he is a bottle of snake oil we bought under false advertising")