Posted on 09/27/2005 5:35:15 AM PDT by beaureguard
IIRC The Ruger Mini-30 is chambered for the 7.62x39.
which caliber is better?
As to which caliber is "better"...
First, you should know that I'm a bit biased. I own four rifles chambered for the 7.62x39 cartridge - 2 SKS rifles, a WASR-10, and an Interarms Mark X (a bolt-action "mini" mauser - my deer rifle).
I own zero rifles chambered for the .223 Remington/5.56 Nato.
Which is "better" is also relative, and depends on what the rifle will be used for.
The .223 Remington has a higher muzzle velocity (and less bullet weight) than the 7.62x39, so it will have a flatter trajectory.
However, the 7.62x39 will deliver more foot-pounds of energy to the target.
If you want to compare the ballistics of the 7.62x39 & .223 cartridges, there are two ballistic programs I recommend (assuming you aren't already familiar with these):
The first is free: Remington Shoot! (Limited to Remington ammunition.)
The second is shareware (30 day evaluation): Shoot! v3.0
Shoot! v3 includes data from most (if not all) ammunition manufacturers. You can compare any three cartridges (any caliber, bullet weight, etc.)
You may also enter your own load data, if you wish.
(She's also a 5th kyu in Aikido. The boys treat her with respect.)
But my hubby (6'6" and about 240#) looks 'em in the eye and gives them a very firm handshake when they come over. It's "Yessir" and "Nossir". A Good Thing.
thanks.
So the mini-30 is better for closser stopping power, which would be good for a "city" environment.
Hey, that's what the .455 Webley is for! Truly a Blunt Instrument in every sense of the word.
But anybody who hunts dangerous game with anything smaller than a .348 Winchester or .375 Holland & Holland is not much brighter than that idiot who tried to talk to the grizzly bears and got eaten for his pains.
Ok everyone is bragging on their kids. This is my daughter and Mother of two of my grandchildren. She was named teacher of the year for her entire district last year.
We were shooting on my parents property in N. Fla. It was really cold that day too.
More than ten actually. I didn't want to give an exact number but, what the hell. Seventeen seems to be the number if I counted correctly. Ten should be a nice round starting point for any home arsenal.
Benelli makes some fantastic shotguns. The nova is among the worst of them. Not terrible by any stretch but not one I would recommend.
Bump for later perusal
If you're going to go 7.62x39, you can get a SKS or an AK clone for less money. The MSRP for a mini-30 is $809, you can get a Yugoslavian SKS for $179, or a Hungarian or Romanian AK for around $4-500. I'm not an AK guy, so look around for better info.
Personally, in a city environment, I'd choose a 12 gauge pump shotgun. Less worry about over-penetration.
In fact, I just picked up some Winchester "Super Speed Xtra" shot shells. More muzzle velocity (IIRC 55 fps) than their standard shot shells, and "hard shot for improved patterns" and "improved knockdown power".
With that being said, if I had only the .223 and 7.62x39 to choose from, I'd buy something chambered for the 7.62x39, and load it with soft-point hunting ammo. (Or 7.62x39 hollow-points.)
But I don't live in the city.
At one point, when for some reason I like the idea of ridiculous amounts of recoil in a handgun, I was going to get myself a T/C Contender. This is years ago... At the time, I was either going to get it in .444 Marlin, 45-70, or (what was considered the world's most powerful handgun cartridge at that time), the .375JDJ. I just wanted to be sure that I'd never be bothered by varmints like cape buffalo in my back yard. You never know, one might show up! And just in case, it always pays to be prepared! I had the chance to meet a guy who happened to have a T/C in .444 Marlin, and one shot from that helped me decide that while interesting, I really didn't need to submit myself to that sort of abuse on a regular basis!
Still, the .375JDJ has been used to take all big game in North America, as well as Africa! Although I can't imagine shooting an elephant or cape buffalo with a bullet or 270 or 300 grains. Anything less than 500 grains just seems "weak."
Mark
Absolutely.
Look into a (Romanian) WASR-10 (semi-auto AK-47 knock-off). Chrome lined, and very reliable. Mine was $350.
SKS rifles (should) run less.
Personally, I'd avoid the Yugoslavian SKS rifles. They're not chrome lined.
You can find a bunch of info on both the SKS and AK/AKM here: http://www.surplusrifle.com/index.asp
Amen to that.
Explain, please, the difference between the two.
I wonder if a scout axe is the same as the Hudson Bay Axe. I have one and it is about half way between an axe and a hatchet. I like it but actually think a hatchet is better for most jobs and a full sized axe for others.
What I've seen across the net, and this just seems to make the most sense to me anyway...
.357 wheel gun with matching .357 carbine...
Smith & Wesson Models 620 .357 Magnum / Model 94 Ranger Compact .357 Magnum
Check out the Ruger forum. Lots of good advice and info on the sp 101 and other Rugers.
http://www.rugerforum.com/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rugerforum/Ultimate.cgi?action=intro
You couldn't go wrong with the Ruger Mark II or Mark III. I've had a Ruger for 30 years and it's still dependable and accurate. Of course, ergonomics are important and if the Walther feels good in your hand, all things being equal that would be a good choice.
In my younger days I dropped a few deer with a .22 mag. It's a good gun but not for learning. .22 LR ammo is so cheap it's the logical choice for a newbie.
Just a note on your remark about jams with you first few rounds. You might try running a dry swab through the barrel before you start shooting to clean out the oil residue. That may help.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.