Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush seeks to federalize emergencies
Washington Times ^ | 9/27/05 | Bill Sammon

Posted on 09/27/2005 8:19:23 AM PDT by Crackingham

President Bush yesterday sought to federalize hurricane-relief efforts, removing governors from the decision-making process.

"It wouldn't be necessary to get a request from the governor or take other action," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said yesterday.

"This would be," he added, "more of an automatic trigger."

Mr. McClellan was referring to a new, direct line of authority that would allow the president to place the Pentagon in charge of responding to natural disasters, terrorist attacks and outbreaks of disease.

"It may require change of law," Mr. Bush said yesterday. "It's very important for us as we look at the lessons of Katrina to think about other scenarios that might require a well-planned, significant federal response -- right off the bat -- to provide stability."

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) accused Mr. Bush of attempting a power grab in the wake of fierce criticism that he responded too slowly to Hurricane Katrina a month ago.

"Using the military in domestic law enforcement is generally a very bad idea," said Timothy Edgar, national security policy counsel for the ACLU. "I'm afraid that it will have unforeseen consequences for civil liberties."

SNIP

But stabilizing a crisis might require federal troops to arrest looters and perform other law-enforcement duties, which would violate the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. The law was passed in the wake of the Civil War and Reconstruction to prevent the use of federal troops from policing elections in former Confederate states.

The White House wants Congress to consider amending Posse Comitatus in order to grant the Pentagon greater powers.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; possecomitatus; powergrab; sammon; term2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2005 8:19:26 AM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Hmmm, what would a guy like Billy Clinton do with this kind of power?


2 posted on 09/27/2005 8:21:47 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Damned if he do, damned if he don't. What a lousy Catch 22 the Pres is stuck in.


3 posted on 09/27/2005 8:23:33 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Don't get stuck on stupid now, reporters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
This is a typical example of the dysfunctional behavior of trying to be responsible for someone else's irresponsibility. Some of us have tried that approach within the family system and it breeds nothing but dependency, resentment, pain, and more suffering.

Create a great Free Republic Day!

4 posted on 09/27/2005 8:23:42 AM PDT by moasicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
All this because of some highly incompetent idiots in Louisiana, i.e., DemokRATS
5 posted on 09/27/2005 8:23:43 AM PDT by lormand (George W. Bush is saving your ass, whether you like it or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Huge mistake.

Anytime the Federal Gov't gets more power, its bad.


6 posted on 09/27/2005 8:24:47 AM PDT by mad puppy ( The Southern border needs to be a MAJOR issue in 2006 and 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

This is a very bad idea.

I can understand Bush's wish to be able to help and not have his hands tied by incompetent governors.

However, the States are supposed to be free from Federal interference in such issues unless they ask for help. THe states have the authority and the responsibility, and it should remain that way.


7 posted on 09/27/2005 8:26:03 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

It's a Catch-22 for sure.

The federal government are not first responders. However, what happens if state and local officials (as well as FEMA) bungle the case, as they did with Katrina?


8 posted on 09/27/2005 8:27:53 AM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

no one is "demanding" he do this - he should just leave this issue alone. its not going to pass congress anyway.


9 posted on 09/27/2005 8:27:57 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"Damned if he do, damned if he don't. What a lousy Catch 22 the Pres is stuck in."

Agreed, the President is getting it from all sides. I believe he does everything within his power to assist those in need.

10 posted on 09/27/2005 8:28:51 AM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83

what SHOULD have happened this time. what Brown is doing right now in his testimony. GO ON OFFENSE AND BLAME THE RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE. rather then taking the blame for something the federal government didn't do.


11 posted on 09/27/2005 8:30:24 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
This is a very bad idea.

I can understand Bush's wish to be able to help and not have his hands tied by incompetent governors.

However, the States are supposed to be free from Federal interference in such issues unless they ask for help. The states have the authority and the responsibility, and it should remain that way.

Just wanted to repeat your statement .

Oh and you flunkys at the ACLU, bite me.

We conservatives will deal with this.

12 posted on 09/27/2005 8:30:34 AM PDT by A message (The Democrat party platform is NOT in the mainstream. It is just foolish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Florida, Texas, Mississippi and Alabama responded very well to the hurricanes. So why should the whole system be changed because one state with a couple of morons for governor and mayor of N'awlins screwed up!
Solution: replace "Dumb & Dumber" and leave well enough alone!


13 posted on 09/27/2005 8:32:03 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
GWB needs to appropriate some federal taxpayer funds and build a new multi-million dollar edifice to house the soon-to-be-burgeoning Dept. of Hurricanes and Other Natural Calamities
14 posted on 09/27/2005 8:32:15 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham; All

Fellow Freepers. I think we are seeing more srtategery in action. This is a direct counter-punch to the media attack on the President's response to Katrina. This move highlights the way the current laws work and will put the liberals in a catch-22. They would love to have more power, but supporting this move lets him off the hook. Opposing this plan shows they really DIDN'T want to fix the problem, just attack Bush. This move parries both lines of attack.


15 posted on 09/27/2005 8:34:42 AM PDT by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

We don't need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Blanco is the bathwater.


16 posted on 09/27/2005 8:35:40 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

The party of smaller government strikes again.


17 posted on 09/27/2005 8:36:42 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
President Bush yesterday sought to federalize hurricane-relief efforts, removing governors from the decision-making process.

...Or, we could just elect competent governors.

18 posted on 09/27/2005 8:37:37 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
What an original idea.....expanding the federal govt's powers.....
19 posted on 09/27/2005 8:38:07 AM PDT by NRA1995 (When liberals speak I hear the Vonage music playing.....woo-hoo, woo-hoo-hoo....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
no one is "demanding" he do this - he should just leave this issue alone. its not going to pass congress anyway.

He should definitely leave it alone. The Stafford Act and The Insurrection act are basically tools that are in place for the President to deal with disasters and national emergencies.

Two idiots in Louisiana doesn't call for new federal powers. Doing so is dangerous to say the least.

20 posted on 09/27/2005 8:38:42 AM PDT by afnamvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson