Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Have to say, this is an excellent move if one wants to avoid the yack fest of the hearings scrutinizing her legal writings and those decisions made from the bench (since she was not a judge).

That is not to say she will not have writings to review but this really does put a snag in things should folks have wanted feisty hearings.

OK, OK, one can hope, we are dealing with some really unfair minded democrats.

Bush consulting with 80 senators says something for this nomonee.

1 posted on 10/03/2005 5:19:57 AM PDT by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: Former Military Chick

bttt


2 posted on 10/03/2005 5:23:36 AM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org Daily Newsfeeds & Weekly Update)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

All I can say is that this is a very disappointing nomination.


3 posted on 10/03/2005 5:23:43 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Miers, 60....

This is the biggest problem with her. She's not going to be on the Court very long.


4 posted on 10/03/2005 5:24:19 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
The AP says, Miers is leading the White House effort to help Bush choose a nominee to the Supreme Court.

Yikes.

6 posted on 10/03/2005 5:25:53 AM PDT by newzjunkey (CA: Stop union theft for political agendas with YES on Prop 75!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
I have to say that both President Bush and Harriet said everything possible to make her confirmation near impossible. Why? Looks like a lot of Democrats are going to be forced to publicly smear a woman.
7 posted on 10/03/2005 5:26:06 AM PDT by hflynn ( Soros wouldn't make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

I must have missed the amendment that gave the Senate the authority to appoint justices.


8 posted on 10/03/2005 5:26:16 AM PDT by IVBama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

What Bush needed was a monster battle in the Senate, ending the nuclear option, not a stealth nominee.

If he wanted to get the base behind him and energized before 2006, he should have picked a strict constructionist, he has not done that here.

Its been a bad few months for the President and he had a chance set the news agenda and get all that crap off the tv for a while.

There are charges of cronyism going around about Brown over at FEMA and the INS director, and he goes and picks his personal lawyer? What was he thinking?

At best Miers maintains the balance of the Court, and that is best case scenario.

I was promised Scalias and Thomases when I put down thousands of dollars and numerous hours for this man to be President. I was satifisfied with Roberts, but Miers is bush league.

Didn't he learn from his father's mistake on Souter?


9 posted on 10/03/2005 5:26:26 AM PDT by RWR8189 (Miers is bush league, forget it, George Allen 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
She also became the first female president of the Dallas Bar Association in 1985 and was the first woman elected president of the Texas Bar Association in 1992.

No, thank you. I'm not hopeful of anyone who has such involvement with the ABA.

10 posted on 10/03/2005 5:27:01 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Well...I think RB, would have been a better choice.

...the 'RATs are going to "BITCH", no matter who GWB nominates...

IOW, The 'Rats bluff has worked..."NO RB, Always playing it safe". :(

14 posted on 10/03/2005 5:27:51 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Well...I think RB, would have been a better choice.

...the 'RATs are going to "BITCH", no matter who GWB nominates...

IOW, The 'Rats bluff has worked..."NO RB, Always playing it safe". :(

15 posted on 10/03/2005 5:27:51 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Who Is Harriet Miers?



President Bush's pick for the USSC?
Do I win the prize?
17 posted on 10/03/2005 5:29:15 AM PDT by WKB (If you can't dazzle them with brilliance.. then Baffle them with BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Got to #3 before the Donner Party showed up!


19 posted on 10/03/2005 5:31:26 AM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Sounds like a post-menopausal Souter. I think I'm going to be sick.


22 posted on 10/03/2005 5:34:37 AM PDT by Altair333 (Stop illegal immigration: George Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Might be this http://www.exodusministriesinc.com/


23 posted on 10/03/2005 5:35:37 AM PDT by neutrality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Howard Dean has praised her in the past. This is probably bad news, but democrats have been known to flip[flop occasionally.


27 posted on 10/03/2005 5:36:59 AM PDT by westmichman (I vote Republican for the children and the poor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

The signs on this one are very bad. Roberts - still effectively unknown - looks like a conservative's dream compared to this one. Government careerist with several red flags indicating a high probability of a severe left turn on the bench - no thanks.


34 posted on 10/03/2005 5:39:30 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Aren't the "reality-based community" folks the same ones who insist there is no objective reality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick


35 posted on 10/03/2005 5:40:08 AM PDT by looky hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
she received numerous other awards from ... the Anti-Defamation League

Can't wait for Kennedy to laber her a racist.

40 posted on 10/03/2005 5:42:39 AM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

I noticed that MSNBC.com states: "Bush picks an insider" while FOXNews.com simply says: "Bush picks Miers". Gives me the impression he might have made a decent choice if the MSM is already trying to sway the issue.


43 posted on 10/03/2005 5:43:25 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

f this woman is an unabashed follower of Christ then I'm sure this is not only a good pick, it is Holy Spirit led.


49 posted on 10/03/2005 5:44:34 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson