Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Walkingfeather
by then your were doomed before you put the paper in the typerwriter.

If she had actually put the paper in a typewriter instead of in a laser printer the forgery would have been harder to prove.

145 posted on 10/05/2005 7:28:49 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (We were promised someone in the Scalia/Thomas mold. Instead we got a Dem approved Bush crony. :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio
If she had actually put the paper in a typewriter instead of in a laser printer . . .

Were the documents ever checked physically to determine whether a typewriter was actually used? I bet CBS is not about to submit the orignal document(s) to closer scrutiny.

271 posted on 10/05/2005 8:23:03 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio
Indeed. Running off documents on your computer and pretending that they were typewritten in 1972 - that's pretty stupid. Couldn't somebody have sprung for an actual typewriter? Unconsciously, Ms. Mapes explains this mystery: she and her colleagues were stuck in the past. To their thinking, it didn't matter if somebody realized the 'memos' were fake; the public generally would never hear about it, as long as the media did not question (and the New York Times certainly didn't).
563 posted on 10/06/2005 4:06:36 AM PDT by Christopher Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson