Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

hillary's burqa
Tina Brown, Ed Klein, The Truth About Hillary ^ | 10.06.05 | Mia T

Posted on 10/06/2005 7:23:46 AM PDT by Mia T

hillary's burqa


by Mia T, 10.6.05


$595 pantsuit and sweater, Margaret O'Leary, San Francisco.

Edward Klein
The Truth about Hillary:
What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President



"What Klein doesn't understand is that Hillary's success today depends not on an ability to be aggressively masculine, but on the exact opposite. That black pantsuit is the power woman's burqa -- a disguise for screening out, not extinguishing, distracting gender"

Tina Brown pontificating on the nuances of haute couture
jla



unny. My Margaret-O'Leary ensemble doesn't seem to "screen out" my gender....

Tina Brown is onto something with her 'burqa' reference, but as is the leftie wont, she has it exactly backwards.

While Brown is correct to suggest that the swath cut by missus clinton isn't "aggressively masculine," she is wrong to imply that underneath the self-imposed burqa, missus clinton is female. Genderwise, missus clinton is exactly what you see: submissively male.

Brown's reason for the pantsuits is, thus, wrong. Missus clinton's gender has nothing to do with this particular clinton coverup. (NB: Tina Brown's 'theory of the hillary pantsuit' is also easily disproved by two counterexamples: missus clinton's burqa-length dresses and her reflexive use of the victim pose.)

The reason pantsuits are a must for missus clinton is that she must screen out her lower (NB: as opposed to 'lowest') extremities. (That she is also screening out her submissive affect remains viable, however.)

Do you recall ever seeing hillary clinton during, say, the last ten years, wearing a skirt or dress whose hemline fell between knee and shin (such as they are)?

Early in the clinton 'presidency,' a photo of a knee-to-shin beskirted clinton made the rounds. Even the Times ran with it, as I recall.

A clinton poll wasn't needed to determine that with her legs and low center of gravity, hillary-in-a-knee-to-shin-skirt as a political construct disturbs the aesthetic sensibilities of virtually every male voter extant.

Never again, therefore, did this purported feminist wear anything shorter than a burqa....


 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous, troglodyte mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary, forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)



COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: burqa; clintoncorruption; clintonfailure; clintonrape; clintonscandals; commanderinchief; edklein; feminist; hillary; hillaryclinton; pantsuit; rape; submissive; tinabrown; truthabouthillary; weak

1 posted on 10/06/2005 7:23:55 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jla

Margaret O'Leary ping


2 posted on 10/06/2005 7:28:02 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


3 posted on 10/06/2005 7:32:49 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
"the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

She only kills when it hits home.

4 posted on 10/06/2005 7:38:13 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Just a bag over her head would do the trick.


5 posted on 10/06/2005 7:39:18 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Yep.....her 'burka' is very ambitious! Hopes to 'stand on its own' in 2008!


6 posted on 10/06/2005 7:44:35 AM PDT by JulieRNR21 (Outraged about a crescent at Flight 93 Memorial? Call 1-814- 443-4557 to leave comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21

And once and a while, Victim Pink.


7 posted on 10/06/2005 7:51:47 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

8 posted on 10/06/2005 7:51:57 AM PDT by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

yep, it's the legs. They are monsters. She has one figure type from the waist up and a totally different figure type from the waist down. It's a real curse and she wears pants to hide it. I knew a woman who had lipo-surgery (sp?) to get rid of her huge lower half. I have often wondered why hillary didn't do that.


9 posted on 10/06/2005 8:14:19 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

The legs are like pylon's... the hips like a bridge abutment. She's better designed for offshore drilling than negotiating the hallways of the Senate.


10 posted on 10/06/2005 8:28:53 AM PDT by johnny7 (ďNah, I ainít Jewish, I just donít dig on swine, thatís all.Ē)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Because her upward mobility historically depended on his looks
(such as they were according to a certain segment of the electorate),
not hers.
(See
zipper-hoisting.)


11 posted on 10/06/2005 8:29:02 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

For similar architectonics, see 11 ;)


12 posted on 10/06/2005 8:30:43 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

OK let's talk about Bill's looks. Why didn't he get a nose job if his looks were important? Hummmmmmmmm.......... That would have left him with beady eyes and a little ugly mouth. OK I see, too much work to be done here. LOL!


13 posted on 10/06/2005 8:38:48 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
LOL

Her build is 'unique' to say the least.

14 posted on 10/06/2005 8:44:28 AM PDT by johnny7 (ďNah, I ainít Jewish, I just donít dig on swine, thatís all.Ē)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
So what are you saying, HRC's commitment to The Feminine Mystique can be compromised if it means turning off male voters?

"Ya know, I just get tired of the ogling and
cat whistles from the guys when I wear skirts"

15 posted on 10/06/2005 8:46:29 AM PDT by jla (www.deletehillary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Yesterday, I spent two hours on a train with a Muslim and what I presume was one of his wives. She was wearing a burqa.

I realized what is wrong with the Muslims. They put their women in bags, their bombs in the trunk, and their brains in the toilet.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Harriet Miers and the 'Pigpen' Press"

16 posted on 10/06/2005 8:47:40 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (President Bush plays chess while his opponents are playing checkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

He shoots! HE SCORES!!!!!!!!!! GOOAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!


17 posted on 10/06/2005 9:09:46 AM PDT by Americanwolf (I Served proudly.... how dare you tell me I have no convictions...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
They put their women in bags, their bombs in the trunk, and their brains in the toilet.

Very good!

I get a kick out of the young, American females at anti-war rallies... where the 'Pali' flag is always flown. Stupidity on steroids.

18 posted on 10/06/2005 9:45:54 AM PDT by johnny7 (ďNah, I ainít Jewish, I just donít dig on swine, thatís all.Ē)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jla; All
CORRECTION OF LEG PARAMETERS, etc.:

hillary's burqa

by Mia T, 10.6.05


$595 pantsuit and sweater, Margaret O'Leary, San Francisco.

Edward Klein
The Truth about Hillary:
What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President



"What Klein doesn't understand is that Hillary's success today depends not on an ability to be aggressively masculine, but on the exact opposite. That black pantsuit is the power woman's burqa -- a disguise for screening out, not extinguishing, distracting gender"

Tina Brown pontificating on the nuances of haute couture
jla



unny. My Margaret-O'Leary ensemble doesn't seem to "screen out" my gender....

Tina Brown is onto something with her 'burqa' reference, but as is the leftie wont, she has it exactly backwards.

While Brown is correct to suggest that the swath cut by missus clinton isn't "aggressively masculine," she is wrong to imply that underneath the self-imposed burqa, missus clinton is female. Genderwise, missus clinton is exactly what you see: submissively male.

Brown's reason for the pantsuits is, thus, wrong. Missus clinton's gender has nothing to do with this particular clinton coverup. (NB: Tina Brown's 'theory of the hillary pantsuit' is also easily disproved by two counterexamples: missus clinton's burqa-length dresses and her reflexive use of the victim pose.)

The reason pantsuits are a must for missus clinton is that she must screen out her lower (as opposed to 'lowest') extremities. (That she is also screening out her submissive affect remains viable, however.)

Do you recall ever seeing hillary clinton during, say, the last ten years, wearing a skirt or dress whose hemline fell below the knee and above the ankle (as best as those bounds--and, hence, that area of leg--can be distinguished from the whole)?

Early in the clinton 'presidency,' a photo of a shin-length beskirted clinton made the rounds. Even the Times ran with it, as I recall.

A clinton poll wasn't needed to determine that with her legs and low center of gravity, hillary-in-a-shin-length-skirt as a political construct would be rejected by virtually every male voter extant.

Never again, therefore, did this purported feminist wear anything shorter than a burqa....


 
It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous, troglodyte mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary, forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)



COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005
19 posted on 10/06/2005 9:54:05 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


20 posted on 10/06/2005 3:16:16 PM PDT by jla (www.deletehillary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


21 posted on 10/06/2005 3:46:39 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

bump


22 posted on 10/06/2005 4:56:12 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


23 posted on 10/06/2005 6:37:31 PM PDT by jla (I support "Aunt Harriet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


24 posted on 10/08/2005 6:24:22 PM PDT by jla (www.deletehillary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


25 posted on 10/10/2005 7:58:20 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson