[Dane]

The only reason these sources are 'unnamed' is that nobody knows who they are, so it would be meaningless to name them. It sounds as if at least 3 people verified this account. Sure they are Leahy's staff, but why would they lie? This information is probably beneficial to Miers nomination if they are trying to sell her to the left as a moderate. In absence of a denial, I have to believe it. Unfortunately, with this nominee, this kind of info the best info we have.

I.E fancy words that you beleive the Wash Compost.

That newspaper that has never ever spread disinformation in political battles.(/sarcasm)

[Always Right]

I.E fancy words that you beleive the Wash Compost.

I believe the Washington Post tries to get the facts accurate. It is usually the details they leave out and the spin of the story that is highly questionable. This seems like a straight-forward question and a blunt answer. If this information is incorrect, I would have the a message would be put out by Harriet or the White House that this is not the case. It is just sad that we know so little about the candidate that this is the only kind of information we are getting about what kind of judge she will be.