Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadIvan
Well one of the things that has been said about her is that she is an experienced bureaucrat, that would explain her emphasis on administration. But that's not the role of a Supreme Court justice.

And a bureaucrat is not exactly the perspective I would want on the Supreme Court. I really think Harriet Miers is probably a great lady. She sounds like she is pro-life and pro-guns. But I also think that she is willing to compromise on her values because of her bureaucatic background. I am up in the air on her. Bush has misplayed his hand, and it is kind of too late to deal a new one.

158 posted on 10/07/2005 8:10:36 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right

I don't question that she is loyal to Bush...as to how strong a conservative she is, I don't know. But that's the problem, there are far too many questions about her. We don't have the reassurance of her having clerked for Rehnquist or being a member of the Federalist Society, like Roberts. Bush was asked to give a proven jurist, he provided an enigma.

Regards, Ivan


160 posted on 10/07/2005 8:17:13 AM PDT by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson