Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dobson Admits Doubt -- Focus Founder Questioning Early Endorsement of Miers
Rocky Mountain News ^ | M.E. Sprengelmeyer

Posted on 10/07/2005 1:34:08 PM PDT by hinterlander

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 last
To: nikos1121
Instead of the airwaves being filled with a fight...I'd rather the airwaves be filled with the coming successes in Iraq along with Saddam's upcoming trial. I think the media would have loved a fight.

I suspect Miers is going to be great.

201 posted on 10/10/2005 10:42:23 AM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: LS

"ONLY Republicans can stop her from being confirmed. If they do that, there will be no "proven originalist,"---EVER. Do you get this? It is NOT a choice of "Miers or Janice Rogers Brown." It is Miers or Miers.

And if so-called conservatives help torpedo this nominee, you can forget getting ANYONE to the right of Chuck Schumer on the court again."

If that is correct, then it would appear that the GOP got behind the wrong man in 2000. And it would appear that the campaign pledge of Scalia and Thomas was just sop to us conservatives.

But....as you say, get used to it. Why we EVER believed GWB, I don't know. We are starting not to ...but it takes some getting used to. Campaign promises are meant to be broken. At one level we all know that. I guess we just hoped this time was different.

Get used to it. That's good advice.



202 posted on 10/10/2005 11:09:35 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
...how is President Bush going to get a 'real conservative ' confirmed. I believe this woman is conservative, and she has no paper trail.

So what you're saying is that no Republican President can ever nominate a "conservative" person to the US Supreme Court unless there is a 60 conservative (Republican) majority in the US Senate.

That's a pretty tough nut to swallow, my friend.

The problem, I believe, lies in these vague terms. What you and I might call mainstream conservative, the Dems and/or the mainstream media will call extremist right wing idealogue out-of-the-mainstream hack.

Mark my words. The next time GWB (or the next Republican President) tries to put up a known conservative to the Supreme Court, the Dems will characterize that person as someone needing to be fillibustered while at the same time pointing back to this Miers nomination period.

NOW WAS THE TIME for President Bush to at least make an attempt to put that illegal US Senate rule to rest -- permanently.

Unfortunately, he blew it. Dont get me wrong. The Senate Repubs are just as guilty.

They apparantly just dont have the balls for high drama politics as do the Democrats.

203 posted on 10/10/2005 1:53:13 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
GW is not GHW. To blame him for his father's problems is an excuse.

If you can show me a single time when the President has not nominated the most conservative person with any shot of being confirmed...and then some, then you have a case. But not until then.

I don't know any of these people. So the trust me argument doesn't work either. How do you know that someone who writes some article for a journal is telling the truth anyway?

This all comes down to trust me and you know it.
204 posted on 10/10/2005 2:04:38 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: THEUPMAN

Carter was born again too.....lol....folks here who go gaga over evangelical are ignorant.

plenty of lefty evangelicals


205 posted on 10/10/2005 2:07:02 PM PDT by wardaddy (double Bot rations all round...we're gonna need them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
As I've said before, I will never vote for McCain or Frist.

I predict it will be McCain against Hillary.

206 posted on 10/10/2005 2:09:36 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]


207 posted on 10/10/2005 2:13:45 PM PDT by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon
ALL this is part of the plan...the ultimate Machiavellian liberal con job of all time

You forgot the sarcasm tag.
208 posted on 10/10/2005 2:49:12 PM PDT by LanaTurnerOverdrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

"Instead of the airwaves being filled with a fight...I'd rather the airwaves be filled with the coming successes in Iraq along with Saddam's upcoming trial. I think the media would have loved a fight.
I suspect Miers is going to be great."

I agree with you. There are too many Freepers out here who are bashing the President and saying disrespectful things etc. I've heard enough things about H. Meirs to feels good about her. He's taking and easy win here and not gambling on what might happen with a more controversial candidate that among other things may allow McCain and his band of idiots to undermine the president again.

No, confirm her and let's move on to the things you and others are talking about.


209 posted on 10/11/2005 7:56:03 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

That there's a good possiblity she's gay?


210 posted on 10/11/2005 8:36:12 AM PDT by american spirit (Can you handle the truth? - www.rbnlive.com ( 4-6 CST M-F)) / click "listen live")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MojoWire

When in the last 30 years has a Republican President ever been able to nominate a true conservative? There was a battle over Bork (we lost) and Thomas's hearing were a zoo. He was narrowly confirmed by a more congenial Senate then we have now. The problem is we do not have 51 votes for the nuke option-too many rinos. The gang of 14 destroyed any chance President Bush had of nominating a known conservative. The Dems will fight to the death to retain their one avenue of power. The Repubs will cave; this is reality, my friend, regrettable but true.


211 posted on 10/12/2005 4:24:18 AM PDT by nyconse (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Carter was a Baptist, big difference in Baptist and true Evangelicals.


212 posted on 10/12/2005 4:26:07 AM PDT by nyconse (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

President Bush ran in 2000 with the idea that the Senate would play fair...they haven't. You have to accept unless and until we have more true conservatives in the Senate-enough to stop filibustering (unprecedented I do not know how Pres. Bush could have forseen this), you can not get known, outspoken conservatives on the bench.


213 posted on 10/12/2005 4:28:32 AM PDT by nyconse (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

Southern Baptists ...of which I have been all my life....consider themselves Evangelical.


214 posted on 10/12/2005 7:16:01 AM PDT by wardaddy (Save a cow......eat a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson