Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/10/2005 9:17:06 AM PDT by SmartCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SmartCitizen

Geez. What makes anyone on the Right think Miers is pro-choice? You'd think W nominated Hillary for the SCOTUS! Take a breath. Or a pill.


2 posted on 10/10/2005 9:20:35 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmartCitizen

one can only hope.....


3 posted on 10/10/2005 9:22:35 AM PDT by fifthvirginia (keeping their memory green)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmartCitizen

The time has come for pro-life and pro-family groups to hold this administration to a higher standard, instead of assuming a ‘cheerleader’ position that keeps their backs to the action.




Sorry buddy, you already voted. Your opinion no longer matters to the Repubs. Sad, but they got what they wanted out of you and now they appear to be done with you. Like one sitting RINO Senator recently said....Just shut up.

I really am sorry because my views are the same as the authors'. But I am realistic enough to realize that like any other politician, once a repub has already got your vote, you really don't count for jack unless you have millions to donate.


4 posted on 10/10/2005 9:25:16 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Ready, Stop! Hamster Time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmartCitizen

Gosh is ol' Stephen Peroutka a brother or something to that 3rd party candidate for President Michael Pereoutka who abandoned his step children to the State of Maryland. Tlak about family values


15 posted on 10/10/2005 11:02:28 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmartCitizen

NPLAC’s Five Questions are:

Do basic human rights come only from government or are they rooted in something that transcends government?

Is man’s inherent human nature fixed or does raw political power determine who is and is not a member of the human family?

Is law merely the construct of jurists and lawmakers or is it based on first principles of morals and justice?

Is the proper role of the judiciary to restrain/limit itself to interpreting law or does it possess de facto legislative powers?

Should the judiciary share power equally with the other two branches of government (the legislative and executive) or should its powers transcend them?




Good questions. I see this group submitted them to the Senate for Roberts' hearing, but I don't recall anybody asking anything about the first three questions.

I'd like to see Brownback asking the first three questions of her.


26 posted on 10/10/2005 11:26:52 AM PDT by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson