Wow, what a masterful rebuttal. I'm awed by your intellect and your mastery of the evidence you have marshalled to support your position.
You probably still believe the scientists who told my mom to keep the kids inside because polio comes out of the ground and if they don't go outside, they won't get it.
You probably believe that was an intelligent refutation of what I've actually written.
Science is guesswork, at best, when it comes to trying to prove evolution.
Wrong, it's based on overwhelmingly massive amounts of evidence, research, and independently cross-confirming validating tests. But hey, enjoy your fantasies.
Why is it guesswork...because they just keep floating new theories hoping that one will stick in the minds of men.
Wrong again. But hey, just for fun, let's give you an opportunity to show off your "legend in your own mind" knowledge of evolutionary science, shall we? Name two things that Darwin wrote in "Origin of Species" which have subsequently had to be revised with a "new theory". Go for it. I can't think of *any*, personally, but you seem to have hallucinated a few, so let us know what they are.
(Be careful, this is a trap. I'm telling that in advance, knowing that you'll *still* fall right into it if you attempt to respond.)
Guesswork of men? Word of God? No Brainer.
