Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Your post displays the divide between your faction and mine. You say it is "a judicial position." I say that it is one of nine people who will decide if this country, this republic, this idea that we call "America" continues to exist.

That's why we strict constructionists are so outraged by this nomination and why -- flawed person that I am -- I could never imagine refusing to serve if I were ever so honored as to be called to make such a contribution.

If you do not see it in these terms, stop for a moment and reflect about those of us who do.
131 posted on 10/11/2005 9:40:06 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Iwo Jima
That's why we strict constructionists are so outraged by this nomination and why -- flawed person that I am -- I could never imagine refusing to serve if I were ever so honored as to be called to make such a contribution.

And what if I thought you weren't qualified and came on here and beat the hell out of you, calling for you to step down without a hearing?

Harriett Miers did not refuse the call of W. We should give her a hearing.

155 posted on 10/11/2005 9:44:45 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson