Given that she has no record, never expressed a judicial philosophy (likely because she's never thought enough about the Constitution to have one) and all we have to go on is Bush's word for it, she should be opposed.
We've tried the stealth strategy for 25 years and only one of the four stealth candidates ended up being a conservative and originalist. There is absolutely NO excuse for tolerating another stealth candidate when Republicans hold 55 seats in the Senate.
Compare the stealth strategy to the Clinton strategy -- finding known quantities and nominating. Clinton and the Democrats weren't surprised once by the way Ginsberg and Breyer have voted because they knew what they were getting. Until conservatives are smart enought to demand known originalist, nothing is going change.
Too many in this battle are stuck on stupid and it is a real handicap in trying to change the direction of the country.
Gee, I thought all Bush's appointments to the bench deserved an up or down vote. Isn't that what we were saying just a short while ago?